Old Fender Rhodes electric piano

  • Thread starter Thread starter jordankersten
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electric Piano
AI Thread Summary
An individual is rebuilding an old Fender Rhodes electric piano and is addressing a popping sound caused by a stereo pan circuit that uses an oscillator and transistors to switch light bulbs controlling audio channels. They have added 68uf capacitors to reduce the popping, which has helped significantly, and are inquiring about the safety of using these capacitors and the possibility of using higher capacitance to eliminate the noise completely. Discussions suggest that while adding capacitors is generally safe, it may affect the vibrato amplitude and recommend considering a resistor to smooth the vibrato waveform. The conversation also touches on personal preferences regarding the mechanical action of Rhodes compared to other electric pianos. Overall, the focus remains on improving the Rhodes' audio performance while ensuring the safety of the components involved.
jordankersten
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone! I have an old Fender Rhodes electric piano I am rebuilding and I have a question. It uses a stereo pan circuit which pans the signal back and forth between the left and right amplifiers. It does this with a simple oscillator circuit that drives two 2N3053 transistors (now replaced with NTE 128's) that switch two light bulbs back and forth which then control each channel via a photo-cell. When the light bulbs get switched OFF, you get a bit of a pop each time. This results in a slight popping or thumping that pans back and forth when the light bulbs turn off. I put 2 68uf capacitors between the collectors and emitters of the 2n3053's and this helped a lot. The popping is hardly noticeable. I am wondering if A) is that safe to put those caps there, and B) if so, can I put in a higher uf cap to completely rid of the pop. I am wondering if this is safe for those transistors. Also, should I be using polarized or non-polarized electrolytics Thanks everyone!

P.S. Here is a schematic of the entire pre-amplifier with the vibrato circuit: http://www.fenderrhodes.com/org/manual/index2.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org


Very Sorry, I thought that was a direct link to the schematic. To get to the schematic, click on "schematics" and it is Fig 11-8 "Pre-amp for 80 Watt suitcase and super satellite."
 


i don't see any reason it would hurt the 2N3053 transistors (that are driving the light bulbs). it would cause a little reactive load to the transistors in the flip-flop oscillator that is driving the 2N3053s. it will reduce the amplitude of the vibrato for faster vibrato as you increase the capacitance. you could put a resistor between the caps and the bases of the transistors to maybe round out the vibrato waveform a little. that may or may not be desirable. you have to listen to it to see.

i'm more of a DSP guy now, but long ago, in another life (about the same time the Rhodes was designed), i was a sort of circuits guy. I've always thought the mechanical action of the older Rhodeses were a little hard compared to a Wurlitzer model 200.

best of luck,
 


Thanks for the reply! I have actually never played a Wurlitizer. Just my Rhodes and my B3...but playing Steinways on jazz gigs, the Rhodes feels good to me...I tend to like the heavier action.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Back
Top