Old Quantum Theory = Oscillations?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the understanding of Quantum Theory, particularly focusing on the Bohr Sommerfeld quantization rule and the WKBJ semiclassical approximation. Participants explore the implications of oscillating particles, potential energies, and the mathematical treatment of integrals in these contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the nature of oscillating particles in Quantum Theory and how it relates to the Bohr Sommerfeld quantization rule.
  • Another participant questions the specific potentials being considered, mentioning potential energies denoted as V(x) and U(x).
  • There is a discussion about the integrals associated with different potentials, with one participant providing specific forms of potential energy and their corresponding integrals.
  • A participant suggests that the multiplier in front of the integral may relate to the symmetry of the function, indicating that symmetric functions lead to simplifications in the integral calculations.
  • One participant acknowledges a previous oversight regarding the search function and shares a link that clarifies the integration process in the context of oscillations.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on whether the oscillations discussed are Simple Harmonic Oscillations or circular orbits around a nucleus, expressing uncertainty about the nature of the potential energies involved.
  • A later reply mentions that the orbits described are elliptical and reflect the kinetic energy of the system in discrete quanta.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the nature of the oscillations or the interpretation of the potentials involved. Multiple viewpoints and uncertainties remain regarding the mathematical treatment and physical implications.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the clarity of the integrals presented, as well as potential misunderstandings regarding the definitions of potential energies and their roles in the context of oscillations.

karkas
Messages
131
Reaction score
1
Hello again,

I am having this problem understanding Quantum Theory, when it comes to calculations and applications. I'll give you an example.

When using the Bohr Sommerfeld quantization rule we use calculus in...what? Is it an oscillating particle?? That's what I can't seem to understand. Or (this is from some solved exercises I was working on before) when using the WKBJ semiclassical approximation, after putting momentum under the integral, I noticed that the solution had a number multiplying the integral, either 2 or 4 (sometimes there wasn't any). So I have concluded that the WKBJ integral is multiplied by the number of times we want that specific part of the full oscillation of the particle we are studying. Is that really it? I hope you can understand what I am talking about! I also think that it all has to do about the potential Energy U(x), or even something about a potential well.

I really need some guidance over the matter. I would really appreciate it if you could guide me!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what potentials are you looking at?
 
Well actually even this little question sounds a bit tricky to me.

You see in this book of mine, there are exercises that talk about Potentials V(x), that I think are mistaken for U(x) Potential energies. This is another one of my queries.

As for the potentials the particle moves in, there are different ones like [itex]V(x)=1/2 mw^2x_o ^2[/itex] or [itex]V(x)=b|x|[/itex].

The integrals for each of the cases mentioned are as follows:

1st: [itex]\int_{-x_o}^{x_0}dx=(n+1/2)\pi * h-bar[/itex]


and the 2nd Integral: [itex]2\int_{0}^{x_1}dx=(n+1/2)\pi * h-bar[/itex]

I just want to ask, what is the meaning of the multiplier in front of the integral in an oscillation level. Does it mean, as I said, parts of one full oscillation? Because I know that xo and -x0 are the limits of one oscillation. Or am I wrong?

(BTW: If this thread goes to a deeper more Homework level, feel free to move it admins)
 
Your integrals look a bit funny, since you're not integrating anything. Try to be a bit more specific in what the integral really is (also, the latex code for h-bar is \hbar).

Anyways, I think that the factor in front is related to the symmetry of the function. If the function is symmetric, then an integral from [itex]-x_0[/itex] to [itex]x_0[/itex] is the same as 2 times the integral from [itex]0[/itex] to [itex]x_0[/itex]. If the wavefunction is antisymmetric, then it would automatically zero. Your potentials are indeed symmetric, so the energy eigenstates you encounter are either symmetric or antisymmetric. Hence the simplification.
 
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=219445&highlight=Sommerfield+quantization

Never underestimate the power of the search function. This explains it all rather neatly. :smile:

[tex] \displaystyle \oint = \int_0^{x_0} + \int_{x_0}^0 + \int_0^{-x_0} + \int_{-x_0}^{0} = 4\int_{0}^{x_0}[/tex]
 
To xepma: Yes I'm sorry for the funny integrals, I thought that by saying WKBJ or Wilsony-Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization you would understand what I am talking about!

To The Dagda: Thanks very much for the link, so dumm of me to jump the search-in-physics-forums step! Well that last thing for the (I think it's called Contour) Integral and the separate parts are really useful.

So one last thing to conclude a series of questions : The oscillations described (from what I've understood are oscillations) are Simple Harmonic Oscillations with [tex]x_0[/tex] and [tex]-x_0[/tex] edges? Or are they circular orbits around let's say a nucleus?

The Potentials I've described are actually Potential energy? From what I've understood they're the potential energy when the particle stands in [tex]x_max = x_0[/tex], right where Kinetic energy is zero, or something like that. Please excuse my potential misunderstanding since it is somewhat difficult for someone my age not to confuse oscillations combined with quantum mechanics!

(PS. You guys are really helpful! One would think you're secretly paid for this :P)
 
According to that link they are elliptical orbits, they also reflect the kinetic energy of the system too in discrete quanta. Kinetic energy is only 0 at t=0.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K