Olympiad-Type Math Problems: Is Coaching Necessary?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tgt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Olympiad Type
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of solving complex mathematical problems, particularly those found in Olympiad competitions, which differ significantly from standard textbook problems. Despite having advanced mathematical training, individuals find these problems difficult, suggesting that coaching may be necessary for success. The conversation draws parallels between learning math and learning an instrument, emphasizing that prior exposure and understanding of problem-solving techniques are crucial. While some gifted individuals may excel without coaching, most require training to develop the skills needed to recognize patterns and strategies in these problems. The dialogue also touches on the notion that success in mathematics, particularly at high levels, often correlates with experience in competitive environments like math Olympiads, although opinions vary on the necessity of such experiences for all mathematicians.
tgt
Messages
519
Reaction score
2
It is no doubt that these type of problems are very different to problems one would find in a maths textbook. I find them extremely challenging even after done a Master degree in mathematics. However, the solutions make a lot of sense after reading them. I am coaching a high school student in these problems at the moment and she is getting a lot of them wrong despite being the top in her (normal) math class and started math tuition very young at 2 years of age. My question is to be successful at doing these problems, is coaching necessary? Are there kids who can do these problems without coaching and without having done them in the past (e.g without having read many solutions to these problems)?

My feeling is no since this is like saying are there kids who can play the piano without a teacher and without reading piano instruction books. Is this analogy correct or not?
 
Science news on Phys.org
I feel like many of these problems have a certain trickiness inherent, similar to spelling bee words. Very few native speakers would properly spell those words unless they had experience with either the words themselves or the mechanics of the language of origin. Math is similar in that you either need to have seen the problem before, or understand how it was put together in order to know how to get to a solution. I think that learning to spot tricks and identify methods to change or simplify problems are good tools for coaches to provide.
 
So pretty much nobody can solve these problems without prior exposure or coaching?
 
tgt said:
So pretty much nobody can solve these problems without prior exposure or coaching?
There will always be some gifted people who can solve them right away. It requires a special kind of thinking to reveal the essential truth behind the questions. Those who are not gifted have to be very persistent, lucky or trained.
 
I hate Olympiad problems. That's why I am a physics major now.

You do need some "trick" aspect as found in Olympiad problems to succeed as a math major. Just check how many Fields Medialists were former Olympiad national team members... But unfortunately I am very brute force when it comes to math problems...
 
AlonsoMcLaren said:
I hate Olympiad problems.
So do I.
AlonsoMcLaren said:
You do need some "trick" aspect as found in Olympiad problems to succeed as a math major.
With this I do not agree.
AlonsoMcLaren said:
Just check how many Fields Medialists were former Olympiad national team members...
Lots of them?

I don't have personal experience with the Fields Medal and do not expect to have it either.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top