On torque and work having same units

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter benabean
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque Units Work
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 7K views
benabean
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
In rotational motion ,

the units for torque, [itex]\tau = r \times F[/itex],

are N [itex]\cdot[/itex] m


and for work done by a torque,

[itex]W = \int_{\theta1}^{\theta2} \tau \cdot d\theta[/itex], are Joules.

Yet both these quantities are homongenous/ have same SI units.

Is it so wrong to quote torques in Joules? If so, why?
(And vice versa)

b.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Torque and work are two different types of quantities. Work done done is a scalar quantity, whereas torque is a (pseudo)vector.

As a matter of interest, you are not even supposed to say mN for torque, but Nm.

For more, read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torque" .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
they have the same dimensions, but so do the frequency of a sound wave and the rate constant of a first order chemical reaction. Does that mean you can express a rate constant in Hz??
 
you can use the same units if you want, but it might confuse some folks if you used Joules to describe a measure of torque.

turning a shaft against X Nt-m of torque exactly one radian of twist requires X Joules of energy. measuring angles in radians is dimensionless (being the ratio of like-dimensioned quantities: arc length divided by radius).
 
Thanks guys, you're help is very appreciated.