One loop Fermi Constant running

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the mass of the W boson using one-loop energies with the equation Mw²=(πα/GF√2)/sin²θw(1-Δr). The user initially calculated Mw=72.2922 using specific values for α, GF, sin²θw, and Mt, but found this result to be incorrect. The conversation reveals that the discrepancy may arise from using the Tree Level Fermi Constant instead of a running value, which is clarified through references to the Particle Data Group's documentation and calculations involving g₂². Ultimately, the correct running value of GF is approximately 1.1622×10⁻⁵ GeV⁻², aligning closely with reported measurements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of particle physics, specifically the Standard Model
  • Familiarity with the concepts of Fermi Constant and its applications
  • Knowledge of one-loop corrections in quantum field theory
  • Proficiency in using mathematical equations related to particle masses
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation and implications of the running Fermi Constant in particle physics
  • Study the role of radiative corrections in weak interactions
  • Explore the Particle Data Group's resources for updated values and equations
  • Learn about the calculation methods for W boson mass using different approaches
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for particle physicists, researchers in quantum field theory, and students studying the Standard Model, particularly those interested in precision measurements and theoretical calculations of particle masses.

tomperson
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi

I am attempting to calculate the mass of the W boson according to one loop energies using the equation,

Mw2=(πα/GF√2)/sin2θw(1-Δr)

where (Δr)top=(3GFMt2)/8√2π2tan2θw

using values:-

α=α(MZ)=(127.916)-1
GF=1.16634×10-5
sin2θw=0.23116 => tan2θw=sin2θw/cos2θw=sin2θw/(1-sin2θw)=0.300661
Mt=172.9

This gives the result Mw=72.2922, which is very wrong.

I suspect at least part of the discrepancy comes from the fact that the Tree Level Fermi Constant has been used, yet many hours of scouring the Internet has not revealed any running values of it. Is my assumption correct, or is there something more fundamentally wrong with what I have done?

I appreciate any assistance you can lend.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You probably made a mistake plugging numbers in (that formula is ugly). I find 81.6, which is a bit better (WolframAlpha).

I haven't seen much about the definition of a running G_F, but apparently the reported value is measured from the muon lifetime using eq 10.4 in http://pdg.lbl.gov/2011/reviews/rpp2011-rev-standard-model.pdf Looking at that, it looks like any running of the weak coupling is accounted for by the radiative corrections there. In other words, perhaps

G_F = \frac{\sqrt{2} g_2^2(M_Z)}{8M_W^2}

is the reported value.

If that's not the case, it doesn't seem like G_F runs too much. With

g_2^2 = \frac{4\pi \alpha}{\sin^2\theta_W},

I find G_F(M_Z) = 1.1622\cdot 10^{-5} ~\mathrm{GeV}^{-2}, which is very close to the reported value.
 
Thank you. Maths is great until numbers get involved :3
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
34K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K