Op-Amp convex optimization question

  • #1
perplexabot
Gold Member
329
5
Hey all. I have a question regarding an equation in a document I am reading about convex optimization of OP-AMPs. The document is attached, the equation is of section 3.4 and the equation number is (9). Can you please explain how it came to be? I understand that i3 = i4 = i5/2 but I don't understand why W's and L's are the only thing in this equation and why this equality holds.

An explanation for equation (10) would also be nice, but (9) is more important for me!

Thank you for your time.
 

Attachments

  • opamp (1).pdf
    403.9 KB · Views: 257

Answers and Replies

  • #2
berkeman
Mentor
60,850
11,237
The transistor channel width & length are the main defining properties of the transistors in that circuit, since they are all on the same die. To get good matching, you need the geometries to be the same. Maybe I'm misunderstanding your question?
 
  • Like
Likes perplexabot
  • #3
perplexabot
Gold Member
329
5
The transistor channel width & length are the main defining properties of the transistors in that circuit, since they are all on the same die. To get good matching, you need the geometries to be the same. Maybe I'm misunderstanding your question?
Thanks, I was wondering if that fraction was originally the ratio of two Id (drain current) equations for NMOS in saturation with everything cancelling out except for the widths and lengths?

Also, if I may, I would like to know why my cvx Matlab program is ending with "Failed" status : (
Here is my code:
Code:
% Device sizing
clear; clc;
% given variables
mun = 600*(10^-2)^2;
mup = 200*(10^-2)^2;
Vtn = 0.7;
Vtp = -0.9;
lamn = 1/0.03;
lamp = 1/0.06;
Cox = 346*10^-6;
Vomin = 0.1*5;
Vomax = 0.9*5;
Vcmmin = 2.5 - 0.25;
Vcmmax = 2.5 + 0.25;
Vdd = 5;
Vss = 0;
%cvx optimization
cvx_begin gp
    variables L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 L8 W1 W2 W3 W4 W5 W6 W7 W8 Ib I5 I7 I1 I2
    minimize (5*(Ib+I5+I7));
    subject to
        %symmetry and matching
        W1/W2 == 1;
        L1/L2 == 1;
        W3/W4 == 1;
        L3/L4 == 1;
        L5/L7 == 1;
        L5/L6 == 1;
        %physical size limits
        L1 >= 0.8*10^-6;
        L2 >= 0.8*10^-6;
        L3 >= 0.8*10^-6;
        L4 >= 0.8*10^-6;
        L5 >= 0.8*10^-6;
        L6 >= 0.8*10^-6;
        L7 >= 0.8*10^-6;
        L8 >= 0.8*10^-6;
        W1 >= 2*10^-6;
        W2 >= 2*10^-6;
        W3 >= 2*10^-6;
        W4 >= 2*10^-6;
        W5 >= 2*10^-6;
        W6 >= 2*10^-6;
        W7 >= 2*10^-6;
        W8 >= 2*10^-6;
        %area limits
        L1*W1 + L2*W2 + L3*W3 + L4*W4+ L5*W5 + L6*W6 + L7*W7 <= 10000*(10^-6)^2;
        %input offset requirements
        (W3/L3)/(W6/L6)== (1/2)*((W5/L5)/(W7/L7));
        (W4/L4)/(W6/L6)== (1/2)*((W5/L5)/(W7/L7));
        %bias conditions
        I5 == (W5*L8*Ib)/(L5*W8);
        I7 == (W7*L8*Ib)/(L7*W8);
        I1 == I5/2;
        %more bias conditions : p
        sqrt((I1*L3)/((mun*Cox)/(2*W3))) <= Vcmmin - Vss - Vtp - Vtn;
        sqrt((I2*L3)/((mun*Cox)/(2*W3))) <= Vcmmin - Vss - Vtp - Vtn;
        sqrt((I1*L1)/((mup*Cox)/(2*W1))) + sqrt((I5*L5)/((mup*Cox)/(2*W5))) <= Vdd-Vcmmax + Vtp;
        sqrt((I7*L6)/((mun*Cox)/(2*W6))) <= Vomin - Vss;
        sqrt((I7*L7)/((mup*Cox)/(2*W7))) <= Vdd - Vomax;
        %small sig tf constraints
        Av = (2*Cox)/((lamn+lamp)^2)*sqrt(mun*mup*((W2*W6)/(L2*L6*I1*I7)));
cvx_end

All these constraints are from the document in my OP. Also the code is based on example 7.2 (page 24 of the document).
 
Last edited:
  • #4
perplexabot
Gold Member
329
5
BUMP.

Anyone have a clue what I am doing wrong here? I feel like I am missing something big. I will dedicate some more time to it today. Any help will be greatly appreciated.
 

Related Threads on Op-Amp convex optimization question

  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
Top