Open Call: propose a CubeSat payload

  • Thread starter Thread starter p1ayaone1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proposing innovative payload ideas for a CubeSat project that is set to launch in two years. Participants emphasize the need for legal, practical, and feasible suggestions, with constraints on power, size, and weight. Ideas include using infrared thermography for monitoring heat loss in buildings, though concerns about privacy and data transmission capabilities are noted. Another suggestion involves developing low-power, high-bandwidth line-of-sight communication using retro-reflectors, which could have broader applications. The forum encourages contributions from both the public and scientific communities to enhance the project's potential.
p1ayaone1
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
To the good people of PF,

I've been working an a few satellite design projects at school, and we are just getting started on one that might actually be launched (in about two years time).

We have lots of ideas, but we're all electrical, mechanical, and computer engineers, and our thinking is biased by that. So we have been approaching the general public, as well and some of the "pure" scientists at school for payload ideas. I though this would be a perfect forum to hear some ideas.

1. Keep it legal. No weapons.
2. Keep it practical. 1 watt, 10 cm cube, 1.33 kg maximum. Small deployables are possible, so long as they remain connected to the satellite.
3. Keep it real. I'd love to build a wormhole-opener, but I don't know how. Not sure if anyone does.

We are looking for points on innovation, environmental stewardship, or industrial applications. It is possible we have primary and secondary payloads.

Any and all ideas are welcome!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
p1ayaone1 said:
To the good people of PF,
<snip>
Any and all ideas are welcome!

I think it could be cool to have night-time infrared thermography of building roofs, to see how much heat they leak. But I don't know if a cubesat is able to broadcast high bandwidth information (power and size issue). Also that could turn into a somewhat unwelcome monitoring tool.

So how about this: Try to develop low power, high bandwidth line of sight communication. [Could the sat modulate the reflectivity of a retro-reflector so almost no power is used to communicate at optical-fiber bandwidths?] Just a proof of concept, only worthwhile if such solutions are not already well known. Such a technology might even be usable for communicating with an extrasolar satellite.
 
There is a Cubesat Forum (see the links):

http://cubesat.ifastnet.com/forum
http://cubesat.ifastnet.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=1

Take a look at it and ask questions there. Somebody will help you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have Mass A being pulled vertically. I have Mass B on an incline that is pulling Mass A. There is a 2:1 pulley between them. The math I'm using is: FA = MA / 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If MB is greater then FA, it pulls FA up as MB moves down the incline. BUT... If I reverse the 2:1 pulley. Then the math changes to... FA = MA * 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If FA is greater then MB, it pulls MB up the incline as FA moves down. It's confusing...

Similar threads

Back
Top