Open set (differential equation)

AI Thread Summary
In discussions about differential equations, the necessity of open sets, particularly in the context of defining functions like x' = f(t, x), is emphasized. The open set Ω is crucial because it ensures the continuity and differentiability of the function f, which are essential for the existence and uniqueness of solutions to the equations. Even if Ω is not open, it must include an open subset to maintain the meaningfulness of the differential equation. This requirement stems from the mathematical properties that govern the behavior of solutions in the vicinity of points within the domain. Understanding the role of open sets is fundamental to grasping the underlying principles of differential equations.
stanley.st
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Hello !

When I'm reading something about differential equations everywhere it's about open sets. For example when we define special kind of equation

x'=f(t,x)\,;\;f:\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}

Omega is open. Why Omega must be open? Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't know what is the full context. However even if Ω is not open, it must contain an open set for the diff. equ. to be meaningful.
 

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »

Thread 'Non-orthogonal bases'

Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
View full post »
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'

Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'

I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
View full post »

Similar threads

I What is this form of concavity called?
Replies
1
Views
1K
A Linearly independent function sets
Replies
12
Views
2K
I SL(n,R) Lie group as submanifold of GL(n,R)
Replies
36
Views
4K
I (0,1) is uncountable using binary expansions?
Replies
15
Views
2K
I Compact manifold cannot be represented by (single) parametric equation
Replies
5
Views
610
I On Borel sets of the extended reals
Replies
2
Views
2K
A Expansion with respect to ##z_1##
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Question about convex property in Jensen's inequality
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Uniform convergence of difference quotient in higher dimensions
Replies
1
Views
2K
B A differential equation, or an identity?
Replies
6
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top