I Is a Time Rotation Operator Analogous to Spatial Rotations Possible?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter member 743765
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hamiltonian
member 743765
We studied about the time translation operator and that its generator is the hamiltonian the question is could there be a time rotation operator in analogy with rotations in space and what would be it's relation to relativity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lorentz boost seems what you are looking for.
 
  • Like
Likes member 743765 and Hill
phyahmad said:
could there be a time rotation operator in analogy with rotations in space
There can't be a "time rotation operator" in the sense of just "rotating time" and not affecting "space" at all, because (heuristically) "time" is only one dimension and it makes no sense to "rotate" in just one dimension; you need at least two. So you need to include at least one dimension of space in the rotation.

As @anuttarasammyak points out in post #2, Lorentz boosts are the "time-space rotation" analogues of rotations in ordinary space. Boosts require two dimensions, one of "time" and one of "space" (the "space" dimension is the spatial direction in which the boost is applied).
 
  • Like
Likes member 743765
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top