Optical Fiber Transfer Function (attenuation and dispersion)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the transfer function of single mode fiber (SMF) and the user's inquiry about the equation used to simulate the optical field's behavior over distance. They seek clarification on why attenuation, represented by alpha, is divided by two in the equation. Additionally, they are looking for the relationship between two equations related to pulse evolution through SMF. The user also expresses frustration with formatting issues when attempting to use LaTeX for equations in their posts. Forum administrators have acknowledged a recent server upgrade that has caused LaTeX functionality to break, and users are advised to check for updates on the issue.
Oziyak
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have a few questions regarding the transfer function of a SMF. I'm using the below equation to simulate the effect a single mode fiber (SMF) has on the optical field after some distance \textit{z}.
\begin{equation}<br /> S_{out}(\omega) = S_{in}(\omega)\exp\left<br /> [z\left(-\frac{\alpha}{2}-i\frac{\beta_{2}}{2}(\Delta\omega)^{2}-i\frac{\beta_{3}}{6}(\Delta\omega)^{3}\right)<br /> \right ]<br /> \end{equation}<br /> <br /> My question is in regards to the origin of this equation. I understand the inclusion of the $\beta$ terms, and realize that $\alpha$ represents the attenuation, but why is it alpha divided by 2?<br /> <br /> When I look in a textbook I have they say the following equation dictates pulse evolution through a SMF:<br /> <br /> \begin{equation}<br /> \frac{\partial A}{\partial z}+ \frac{i\beta_{2}}{2}\frac{\partial ^{2}A}{\partial<br /> t^{2}}- \frac{\beta_{3}}{6}\frac{\partial ^{3}A}{\partial<br /> t^{3}} = 0<br /> \end{equation}<br />

I suppose I'm looking for the relationship between equations (1) and (2) of this post as well. In equation (2) A is the slowly varying amplitude (or envelope) of the pulse.

Thank you very much for reading, and also for any assistance you can provide. If you require anymore detail from me or if I have missed something please let me know.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I've been trying to reply to my own post for those who are interested... but everytime I try to use more TEX coding for equations it never displays it properly in the preview, so I'm assuming it wouldn't in the post either... can an admin help me with this?

everytime I use a tex tag it just puts beta in it?
 
Oziyak said:
I've been trying to reply to my own post for those who are interested... but everytime I try to use more TEX coding for equations it never displays it properly in the preview, so I'm assuming it wouldn't in the post either... can an admin help me with this?

everytime I use a tex tag it just puts beta in it?

The admins just did a server upgrade over the weekend, and Latex is one of the things that got broken. Check out the Forum Feedback and Announcements forum to see what the progress of the fix is.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top