OPTICS: finding image position using matrix methods

user_
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hello! The question I'm looking to solve is asking me to "analytically evaluate the image" produced by a concave mirror (which I'm assuming is telling me to use matrix methods to find image position, though I'm not sure). I've come across matrix methods which give me the distance from the optical axis to where an incident ray crosses the input plane of the system, but I'm wondering what steps to take in order to find image position.

I haven't been to class is a few days and so I'm really quite lost, and not being able to find any resources which are consistent with this course is really frustrating. Hopefully someone can steer me in the right direction...

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
user_ said:

Homework Statement



Hello! The question I'm looking to solve is asking me to "analytically evaluate the image" produced by a concave mirror (which I'm assuming is telling me to use matrix methods to find image position, though I'm not sure).
That's not what the term "analytically" means - no.
It just means the answer should be an analytical solution rather than a numerical one.
Related to "closed form expression".

Thus you should find a closed-form expression for the position.

OTOH: it sounds like your coursework is covering matrix optics right now.

I've come across matrix methods which give me the distance from the optical axis to where an incident ray crosses the input plane of the system, but I'm wondering what steps to take in order to find image position.

Sketch the situation for ray diagrams - what is special about the image position?
Can you describe the special quality as something you can find from the matrix formalism.

I haven't been to class is a few days and so I'm really quite lost, and not being able to find any resources which are consistent with this course is really frustrating. Hopefully someone can steer me in the right direction...[/QUOTE]
Google for "matrix optics" or "ray transfer matrix".

If the light ray is represented by vector (y,y'), then it goes from the object position o to the mirror, gets reflected, and comes back to the viewer position. At some point the rays appear to diverge from a position other than the object.

So why not start with the transfer matrixes for translation and reflection?
 
Last edited:
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top