Optics mirrors problem with rearview of car

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining if a driver can see the entire width of a car behind them using a rearview mirror. The driver is 40 cm from the mirror, which is 23 cm long, while the car behind is 2.5 m wide and 4 m away. Initial calculations suggest visibility, but there are concerns about the accuracy of the drawn diagram and the similarity of triangles used in the analysis. The key issue is the measurement reference point for the 4 meters, which needs clarification. Overall, the conclusion is that the current approach may not yield the correct answer due to inaccuracies in the diagram and calculations.
alingy1
Messages
325
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm riding my car. My eye is 40cm from the rearview mirror. I want to know if I can see the car behind me. The car behind me is 2.5m large. Can I entirely see the car behind me in his whole wideness? The mirror is 23 cm long. The car is 4 meters behind us.


Homework Equations


Reflection laws.
Similar triangles.


The Attempt at a Solution


So, I drew this triangle (look attachment). And found that the eye, from where he his, can see the whole car. But, the question is not too clear. Do you think my steps are good?
 

Attachments

  • Photo pour Yu2.jpg
    Photo pour Yu2.jpg
    7 KB · Views: 498
Physics news on Phys.org
Where is the 4 meters measured from, the eye or the 23 cm mirror ? I think you have the correct answer though, at least app[roximately.
 
Your diagram is confusing and not accurate. The triangles are not similar.
40/23 is not equal to 4/2.5
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top