Optics question: converging lens with virtual object

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculation of the final image formed by a converging lens and a convex mirror system, where confusion arises regarding the treatment of virtual objects. The calculations show that the lens creates an image 400 cm to the right, which is then used as a virtual object for the mirror, leading to a final image position of 160 cm behind the lens. The confusion stems from differing interpretations of the sign convention for virtual objects; the textbook incorrectly treats the virtual object as real by using a positive distance. Clarification suggests that the direction of light travel should dictate the sign convention, necessitating a switch in labels after reflection. Understanding the behavior of light rays from real versus virtual objects is crucial for accurate calculations in optics.
quickk
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I was thinking about an optics question in a physics textbook. I think the solutions I saw in the solution manual may be wrong.

The question is:
A lens and mirror are separated by d = 1.00 m and have focal lengths of 80.0 cm and -50.0 cm, respectively (so a converging lens, and a convex mirror). An object is placed p = 1.00 m to the left of the lens (so the object is at x = 0, the lens at x = 1.00 m, and the mirror at 2.00 m).

Considering only the light that leaves the object and travels first towards the mirror, locate the final image formed by the system.

When you do the calculations using

1/p + 1/q = 1/f

you find that the lens first creates an image 400 cm to the right of it. Using this as the object for the mirror (so, p = -300, since it is behind the mirror), you'll find q = -60 cm. This means the image is 60 cm behind the mirror, or 160 behind the lens.

So now I look at the last pass through the lens. This is where I am confused. Since the object is behind the lens, I would think that I should use p = -160 cm. With the focal length of the mirror being 80 cm, I find q = 53 cm. According to my understanding of the sign convention, this means that the object is 53 cm to the right of the lens.

However, when I look at the textbook solution, they do not get this. All of the steps are the same until the third calculation. They state that the object is 160 cm to the right of the lens (just like me), then proceed to use p = +160cm, upon which they find q = 160. They interpret this as meaning that the object is 160 cm to the left of the lens.

So, it seems that they simply interpreted the virtual object as being a real one and proceeded from there. This seems reasonable, but goes against all the info that I could find about virtual objects.

Any thoughts?
 
Science news on Phys.org
quickk said:
So now I look at the last pass through the lens. This is where I am confused. Since the object is behind the lens, I would think that I should use p = -160 cm.

However, [they] then proceed to use p = +160cm

"In front of" and "behind" the lens are relative to the direction the light is traveling. "In front of" means the side of the lens from which the light is entering, and "behind" means the side towards which the light is emerging. The mirror reverses the direction of travel, so after the reflection, you have to switch the labels for "front" and "back" sides of the lens.

Another way to think of it: after the reflection step, mentally flip the diagram around so the light is still going from left to right. Or maybe even re-draw the diagram.

Yet another way to think of it: light rays coming from a real object diverge as they hit the lens, whereas light rays heading towards a virtual object converge as they hit the lens.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
752
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
11K