Optics - Transmission of plane wave at oblique incidence

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the direction of electric field oscillations in a given plane wave equation and how to determine the propagation vector change at a dielectric interface. The electric field oscillations can be deduced from the vector components in the equation, specifically from the terms involving unit vectors. The propagation vector's change upon transmission through different dielectric media can be calculated using Snell's Law, which helps find the angle of refraction and the new components of the propagation vector. The participants clarify that the original equation lacks directionality, which complicates finding the electric field's orientation. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of proper vector representation in wave equations for accurate analysis.
Flexington
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I have 2 questions that need help with,

Considering the following plane wave,

E= 30 (0.866 i + 0.5k)exp{i(-0.5x + 0.866z)}

firstly how can i deduce the direction of the electric field oscillations?
And finally, if the wave is incident on a dielectric interface between medium of Er=2 and second Er=3. How can i find the change in propogation vector of the transmitted wave.

My attempt is that i can resolve the propogation vector from its components in the x and z direction from -0.5x + 0.866z, which gives 60 degrees and that the change in magnitude of the propogation vector depends only on the dielectric constants such that,

K[/SUB]2[/SUB] = 3K1/2
(K is mag of propogation vector)
However, to express it back in vectorial form I am lost.


Thank you
 
Science news on Phys.org
Ok, so i have the 2nd part regarding the propogation vector. I can use the angle of refraction, from snells law, to find the x and y components of the transmitted waves propogation vector, with the new magnitude 3/2. As the mgnitude in meda one was 1.

Howver i am still baffled with how i can deduce the direction of oscillations of the electric field?
 
The equation you wrote down has no directionality, so it is no wonder you are having a hard time finding it. As written, your equation is not complete. If it were written:

E=x30 (0.866 i + 0.5k)exp{i(-0.5x + 0.866z)}

then the E field would be pointing in the x direction
 
Flexington said:
Considering the following plane wave,

E= 30 (0.866 i + 0.5k)exp{i(-0.5x + 0.866z)}

firstly how can i deduce the direction of the electric field oscillations?

In (0.866i + 0.5k), I suspect that i and k are unit vectors in the x and z directions respectively. If so, the direction of the indicated sum is given by the usual rules for vector addition.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top