Optimization/maximization with multivariable calculus

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on maximizing the Riemann Sum Σ^n_{i=1}x_{i}*y_i under the constraints Σ^n_{i=1}x^{2}_{i}=1 and Σ^n_{i=1}y^{2}_{i}=1. The original poster seeks guidance on optimization techniques, expressing confusion over the application of derivatives and integration in this context. Suggestions include using partial derivatives to find critical points and considering Lagrange multipliers for constrained optimization. Additionally, there is a mention of interpreting the relationship between the vectors x and y to aid in the solution. The thread highlights the challenges faced by students in understanding advanced calculus concepts.
adradmin
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Maximize the Riemann Sum ##\Sigma^{n}_{i=1}x_{i}*y_i## subject to constraints ##\Sigma^{n}_{i=1}x^{2}_{i}=1## and ##\Sigma^{n}_{i=1}y^{2}_{i}=1 ##

Homework Equations


My teacher doesn't speak English very well. I'm in Calculus 3 and the average on his exams are around 40%. I'm a good Engineering student and need help. In class, we did an optimization problem where you can maximize the volume of say a box since you know length, width, height. We never went over this and I'm wondering how to do this. Despite him teaching us derivatives in that section, should I approach by doing integration and find the bounded region of x^2 and y^2 individually? Limits were never taught that much in high school so I really would appreciate your help.

The Attempt at a Solution


Maybe try the partial derivatives of the last two equations with respect to x and y, then set them to zero to find critical points? That's the only way I knew how to find local max and absolute max. Please help if you can. Thanks guys.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You could try Lagrange multipliers, but in this case the easiest is probably to think what it means in terms of vectors. What should the relationship be between ##\vec x## and ##\vec y##?
 
Last edited:
haruspex said:
I assume it should read <snip>
So do I, and I have edited the OP to read the same as what you wrote. I doubt we'll hear from the thread starter, who hasn't been back since 2007.
 
Mark44 said:
I doubt we'll hear from the thread starter, who hasn't been back since 2007.
Yes, it is from the tranche of old unanswered threads that came in from MHB. My approach to these is to answer exactly as I would for a fresh thread.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K