Optimization of sphere and cyliners (Electrical physics)

AI Thread Summary
Optimization techniques for calculating electric fields around symmetrical insulating and conducting shapes, such as spheres and cylindrical shells, can simplify problems by treating them as point or line charges at their centers. This method yields correct results for outer electric fields, but its mathematical justification is unclear. The discussion highlights that these simplifications are valid primarily for simple geometries and only when evaluating fields outside the objects. Gauss's Law is referenced as a potential framework for understanding these optimizations. Overall, while the approach is effective for quick calculations, a deeper mathematical explanation is sought.
jlee167
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I recently noticed that I have blindly used optimization in some problems that involve symmetrical insulating/conducting spheres and cylindrical shells.
For example, when calculating outer electric field caused by a spherical insulator/conductor, I just treated these as a simple point charge located at their center, and those ways rendered correct answers. Also, in a question involving an infinite cylindrical shell, (given charge density), I treated it as a simple line charge located at its center, and it also gave me a right answer. However, I am still not convinced how this works mathematically. Is it just a way of simplifying problem for faster calculation, or is there any theorem / definiton that fully explain the validity of this simplification?
I would appreciate some help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look up Gausses Law.

You've noticed that the "optimization" only works for simple geometries, and only outside the objects in question.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top