A Optimization problem classification

jumbo1985
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
Here all,

Here's a problem I'm trying to solve.

Given a planar piecewise linear and circular curve (ie. a curve consisting of line and circular arc segments) that represents the path of a particle; a set of rules for traversing the two types of curve segments as well as the transitions between the segments by my particle and finding the travel time (ie the speed is not constant); bounds on jerk/acceleration/velocity

I want to find another planar piecewise linear and circular curve satisfying a set of criteria (described non-rigorously just to provide some context) such as:
- closeness to the original curve
- minimizing the total travel time
- minimizing the jerk experienced by particle

If there are more than one curves satisfying my constraints that is OK.

Which type of optimization does this problem fall under?

I'm looking for some guidance so that I could start reading up on the relevant topics/mathematical tools. I can update the description with more details if necessary.

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would have thought that, if the curve is piecewise linear and circular, the jerk cannot be minimised as it will be infinite at every point where motion changes from linear to circular and vice versa - unless the particle comes to an absolute stop at every such point before proceeding.

I think your problem specification will need to allow a third type of curve section, which is curved but not circular, to allow for a finite jerk to change motion between linear and circular. You may wish to specify limits on how long such 'connecting' sections can be.
 
I forgot to mention that the output curve is to be tangent-continuous. The motion profile will be selected so that jerk is bounded.

So far, Optimal Control seems to be the dominant theory for solving this type of a problem (assuming I have the complete set of rules for motion) as far as mathematical optimization tools.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top