Optimizing RLC Circuit with Extra Resistors for Improved Performance

  • Thread starter Thread starter gfd43tg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resistors Rlc
gfd43tg
Gold Member
Messages
949
Reaction score
48
Hello, I am working on this problem
ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1399243402.897536.jpg


I am having some difficulty finding the right answer. A few points I'd like to expand on so that one can understand my thought process. First off, there is a standard table with the solution to series RLC circuits. I don't think I can use that table with what I have in this circuit. So one idea I have us to modify the circuit to look like what I want with a thevenin equivalent.

If the thevenin idea is wrong, I did nodal analysis and this is what my attempt looks like.
ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1399243617.704557.jpg


I get an expression but the initial current is Zero, which proves troubling to integrate. I also can't tell the nature of damping in this circuit either
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I tried again with the thevenin, which brings me closer to the answer, but their value is

-13.33e^(-.5t)sin(.375t)

Mine is almost the same, but I have that extra -7.5 term that they don't. I get -20.83e^(-.5t)sin(.375t)

ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1399245106.145250.jpg


ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1399245125.039762.jpg
 
At t=0 the capacitor is, presumably, fully charged, so the inductor current and voltage at this time will both be 0.

It's a second order system, so the response will be a decaying sinusoid. Where did you copy the general solution from?

What is alpha described as?
 
Here is the table

Alpha is the damping coefficient

ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1399689560.199109.jpg
 
Maylis said:
Here is the table

Alpha is the damping coefficient
Possibly not. Coefficients are usually dimensionless. Your alpha has units of sec⁻¹.

Your method looks right, but you haven't finished. To determine ic you now have to multiply that derivative by C.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K