Java Oracle vs Google: The Battle for Java Supremacy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Borek
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Google Patent
AI Thread Summary
Oracle's lawsuit against Google centers on alleged patent infringements related to Java technology, raising concerns about the implications for the mobile device market and open source software. The lawsuit challenges the foundational principles of the Java ecosystem established after Sun Microsystems open-sourced the code, potentially deterring developers from using Java without financial assurances to Oracle. The discussion highlights the complexities of trademark and patent law, emphasizing that companies often prefer clear licensing agreements to avoid litigation risks. The conversation reflects on past legal cases, such as the WordPerfect lawsuit, which shaped corporate attitudes toward software development and intellectual property. Participants note that while open source has significant market potential, its adoption in the U.S. is hindered by the fear of legal repercussions, contrasting with more open attitudes abroad. The dialogue also touches on the necessity for companies to navigate the varied licenses within open source, underscoring that not all open source software guarantees freedom from legal challenges.
Borek
Mentor
Messages
29,122
Reaction score
4,541
Seems like nobody yet posted about it:

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-08-13/oracle-says-google-s-android-operating-system-infringes-its-java-patents.html

In short - Oracle sues Google for patent infringements, but some see it as if it is not Google that is targeted, more like market of mobile devices and open source software in general.

http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-08-2010/100813-oracle-java.html

the means Oracle has chosen are extremely disruptive. The lawsuit essentially asserts Oracle's sole right over any Java technology, even if it doesn't use the Java trademarks. This calls into question the whole foundations of how the Java ecosystem has worked since Sun open sourced the code, and will certainly make anyone thinking of launching a project based on the Java codebase think twice if they can't write a check to Oracle up front.

Any comments?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Technology news on Phys.org
Interesting, but it is expected.

Trademark and patent law require that you assert ownership rights and litigate or face losing your patent.

This is the reason that Opensource is not embraced in the US by the corporate world. Companies want to be able to write a check and get a suitable for framing license, that they can show in court proving they are legallly using the software.

I remember the Wordperfect lawsuit, and the price tag of 10,000 per violation, so per desktop really changed the view of software development. I remember for the years following that lawsuit every level of management on a development project would ask about any libraries and software technologies being used in the project.

I believe the java lawsuit has been fought before, or something similar by Microsoft and they won.
 
Open source has a huge potential market value. Google, by far has gained the most from open source.

will certainly make anyone thinking of launching a project based on the Java codebase think twice if they can't write a check to Oracle up front.
I totally beg to differ. Why? Simple logic: anyone should beware of the terms and policy before using the technology. Open source does not guarantee "freedom" and "openness". There are many different licenses, and some are very restricted. If I made something, and you violate the right given by the license, I may consider to sue you. But very often I will not unless this technology is extremely profitable.

In essence, money is the evil behind this lawsuit. LOL

Look at the co-founder of Microsoft. He's suing Google, Apple, and a few other companies!
 
jwxie said:
Open source has a huge potential market value. Google, by far has gained the most from open source.


I totally beg to differ. Why? Simple logic: anyone should beware of the terms and policy before using the technology. Open source does not guarantee "freedom" and "openness". There are many different licenses, and some are very restricted. If I made something, and you violate the right given by the license, I may consider to sue you. But very often I will not unless this technology is extremely profitable.

In essence, money is the evil behind this lawsuit. LOL

Look at the co-founder of Microsoft. He's suing Google, Apple, and a few other companies!

I am old enough to go back to the start of this kind of stuff. THere were two major lawsuits, and one sent shock waves. It is the infamous WordPerfect lawsuit. They basically picked one major company, and sued them for illegal copies, and they won. 10,000 per desktop.

Yeah money is behind all of these and I hope they win. Look at it this way. Hollywood has a nice lobby, so they can call the FBI and they will enforce their copyright. Book publishers, no problem. But with software you are on your own. It is already too easy to rip off software developers so I agree with them.

The problem with open source is the that a company cannot write a check and buy assurances that they will not be sued. Thati is the bottom line in the US. And every project I have ever worked on with large companies I had to ensure that any technology was risk free from this sort of thing.

Open source is big overseas, and they have a different mindset, but the US is a different monster. The only reason it has stuck in the US now is because big players are buying out software like red hat and java. Now a company can write that check.

The other lawsuit was the pkzipware lawsuit. that went on for years. but it never impact end users.
 
airborne18 said:
Trademark and patent law require that you assert ownership rights and litigate or face losing your patent.

No!

Trademark law requires you to defend your trademark or lose it. Patent law is entirely different -- your rights are protected whether you defend them or not, allowing for the so-called 'patent trolls'.
 
CRGreathouse said:
No!

Trademark law requires you to defend your trademark or lose it. Patent law is entirely different -- your rights are protected whether you defend them or not, allowing for the so-called 'patent trolls'.

Is that once you get it.. I thought for the first few years you had to fight it, like if there were any challenges?? What you say makes sense, since drug companies are locked in for a while.
 

Thread 'Learning Assembly and computer architecture for x86'

Dear Peeps I have posted a few questions about programing on this sectio of the PF forum. I want to ask you veterans how you folks learn program in assembly and about computer architecture for the x86 family. In addition to finish learning C, I am also reading the book From bits to Gates to C and Beyond. In the book, it uses the mini LC3 assembly language. I also have books on assembly programming and computer architecture. The few famous ones i have are Computer Organization and...
View full post »

Thread 'Learning data structures and algorithms in different programming languages'

I have a quick questions. I am going through a book on C programming on my own. Afterwards, I plan to go through something call data structures and algorithms on my own also in C. I also need to learn C++, Matlab and for personal interest Haskell. For the two topic of data structures and algorithms, I understand there are standard ones across all programming languages. After learning it through C, what would be the biggest issue when trying to implement the same data...
View full post »

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top