Orbital effect of a sudden change to G

  • Thread starter Thread starter enotstrebor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change Orbital
AI Thread Summary
A sudden change in the gravitational constant (G) would affect Earth's orbital radius, requiring a new radius (r') to maintain the balance of gravitational forces, expressed as G'M'/r'^2 equaling GM/r^2. The discussion emphasizes that one cannot disregard the laws of physics to predict outcomes, as doing so undermines the framework of scientific inquiry. An example is presented where an asteroid, significantly smaller than the sun, merges with the sun without disturbing Earth's orbit, raising questions about the gravitational effects of such a mass change. The conversation highlights that even negligible mass changes would still influence Earth's orbit, challenging the notion of a temporary absence of gravitational influence. Ultimately, the complexities of gravitational interactions must be considered to understand any potential orbital changes.
enotstrebor
Messages
116
Reaction score
1
If the gravitational constant suddenly changed, would the Earth change its orbital radius r' such that the new G'M'/r'^2 equals todays GM/r^2. If not how?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
There is no way to answer the question "if I dispense with the laws of physics, what do the laws of physics say will happen."
 
Vanadium 50 said:
There is no way to answer the question "if I dispense with the laws of physics, what do the laws of physics say will happen."

Another version which I think does not dispense with the laws of physics.

An asteroid 1.0*10^-15 the mass of the sun's mass joins with the sun (giving the sun's new mass M'). The asteroid's path into the sun does not disturb the orbit of earth.
Considering only the effect of the suns mass change (I know there are other effects), is there an orbital radius change such that M'G/r'^2 is equal to the old M_sun/r^2. If not, no matter how negligible the effect, what is the gravitational effect of the mass change to Earth's orbit (e.g. change in P?).
 
You can't have an asteroid magically have no gravitational pull on the Earth until it hits the sun, and then magically have it's gravity restarted. There is no way to answer the question "if I dispense with the laws of physics, what do the laws of physics say will happen."
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
762
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top