Order notation: f(x)=O(x^n) as x-> 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter coverband
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
AI Thread Summary
Order notation, specifically f(x) = O(x^n) as x approaches 0, indicates that a function f(x) is bounded by a constant multiple of x^n near zero. This means there exists a constant C such that |f(x)| is less than C|x^n| for all x in a small interval around zero. Examples provided include functions like sin(x), which can be approximated as sin(x) = x + O(x^3) as x approaches 0, illustrating how higher-order terms become negligible. The notation helps formalize the idea that certain terms in a function can be ignored for small values of x, while still accounting for their impact. Understanding this concept is crucial for accurately analyzing the behavior of functions near zero.
coverband
Messages
170
Reaction score
1
Hello,

I am having difficulty getting to grips with “the order notation”. I have the following definition…

“A function f(x) is said to be of order x^n as x -> 0 if there is a non-zero constant C such that |f(x)|<C|x^n| for all x in an interval around x=0. This is written as
f(x) = O(x^n) as x->0”

some examples:

x(1+x^2)^1/2 = x + x^3/2 +… = O(x)
x/(1+x) = x(1 – x + x^2 +…) = O(x)
(x+b)^a – x^a = x^a(1 + ab/x +…) –x^a = O[x^(a-1)]
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
As an example, sin(x) = x + O(x^3) as x -> 0. sin(0.01) is about 0.01 - 0.01^3 * 1/6, sin(0.001) is about 0.001 - 0.001^3/6, and so forth. In this case C is something like 1/6 for an appropriate interval.

I'm not sure exactly what you want. The intuition is that the function near 0 is closely approximated by the given polynomial.
 
The idea behind the "big O" notation is to make rigorous the idea that, say

e^x = 1 + x + \mbox{ terms involving } x^2 \mbox{ or smaller}​

which you would write as

e^x = 1 + x + O(x^2) \mbox{ as } x \rightarrow 0​

and which means that

|e^x - 1 - x| &lt; C|x^2|​

for some C, for all small x.

You are, in effect, treating x2 as negligible for the purpose of your calculation, but instead of just ignoring it, you keep track of what you have ignored. By the end of your calculation, you should find the ignored term goes to zero as x \rightarrow 0. If it doesn't, you've neglected too much, and you'll have to go back and add another term.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top