Order parameter of charge density wave in one dimension

Yiping
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
In one dimensional electron gas in charge density wave phase, as I know , the density of electrons will be periodic. The order parameter of charge density wave is written as
O_{CDW}(x)=\sum_s\psi_{L,s}^{\dagger}(x)\psi_{R,s}(x)
For Luttinger model, the \psi is the Fermion annihilation field operator.
I am not very familiar with Luttinger liquid, I try to understand why the order parameter of CDW would be written in this form. If I try to construct an order parameter for CDW by myself, I would guess the Fourier transform of electron density will be a feature for CDW, but I don't know the periodicity of the CDW. If the order parameter is correct, for CDW with any periodicity, I should find that <O_{CDW}>=1. I am not able to construct such order parameter by myself.
I can't understand why the order parameter will be the summation of
\psi_{L,s}^{\dagger}(x)\psi_{R,s}(x)
, it seems odd for me. Creating a right-moving electron and destroy a left-moving electron?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It does indeed seem odd. Are you sure the hermitian conjugate isn't present?
 
Yes, I copy the definition from J.Voits onedimensional fermi liquid p.1008

I try to start from the density operator \rho(q)=\sum_k c_{k-q}^{\dagger}c_k.
Then, decompose the Fermion operatorc_k=\Theta(k)c_{R,k}+\Theta(-k)c_{L,k}.
Insert the relation into the density operator and expand it, I get four different kind of terms, with the same chirality or different chirality. After the Fourier transform, I think it is less odd for me.
The termc_{R,k-q}^{\dagger}c_{L,k}seems to be the term \psi_R(x)^{\dagger}\psi_L(x), but it is only for q\sim-2k_F.
The CDW order parameter seems to include only this kind of term. I guess it is because the Hermitian conjugate only present the term with q\sim2k_F, which just shows the same periodicity of CDW in real space.

Except that, after I expand the density operator in this way, terms with the same chirality will be \rho_R(x)+\rho_L(x) which will not give periodicity in real space, since the momentum is "almost" conserved. So the density modulation must comes from the cross term(momentum is not conserved<>translational invariance breaks.), which shows in the original question.
Then I am confused again, does that mean the momentum transfer, q, can only be 0,\pm2k_F,\pm4k_F,...\pm2^nk_F which means in one-dimensional fermion, the allowed periodicity for CDW is restrict to be some specific value?
 
Last edited:
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top