Organometallic Reaction: Benzoic Acid and Phenylmagnesium Bromide Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sastronaut
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reactions
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the reaction between benzoic acid and phenylmagnesium bromide, a Grignard reagent. Participants express confusion about how to initiate the reaction, particularly regarding the acidic hydrogen in benzoic acid. It is noted that Grignard reagents typically react with acids, but the specifics of this reaction are unclear to some. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the role of Grignard reagents in organic chemistry and their limitations when reacting with certain functional groups. Overall, the interaction emphasizes the need for clarity on the mechanisms involved in organometallic reactions.
Sastronaut
Messages
68
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Write an equation showing how benzoic acid would react with phenylmagnesium bromide.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I am not quite sure where to start first with this Reaction. I haven't seen a Organometallic + acid reaction before. I realize that i have an acidic hydrogen but what would be the first step? would an ether result!? any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks pf! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Magnesium and bromide in organic chemistry means only one type of reaction. Actually just googling for reactions of phenylmagnesium bromide gives name of the reaction between first hits. You should really try harder before asking.
 
I know borek, thank you. It gives you the (preparation) reaction mechanism to form phenyl magnesium bromide from bromobenzene and magnesium metal which i understand. It also shows the mechanism to form triphenylmethonal with phenyl magnesium bromide which i also understand. But neither of those reactions use benzoic acid and that is what is throwing me off
 
Phenyl magnesium bromide is a Grignard reagent - have you heard that name?

What is a common use of Grignard reagents?

Why is it of no use here?
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top