Origin of Tension: Newton's 3rd Law or Electrostatic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PFuser1232
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Origin Tension
AI Thread Summary
The tension force in elastic springs and strings is fundamentally linked to Newton's third law, which applies regardless of the material composition. Most objects are held together by electromagnetic forces, with exceptions for atomic nuclei and gravitationally bound massive objects. Tension arises when a spring or string is pulled from both ends, creating a balance of forces among individual atoms, which can be viewed as tiny springs themselves. This interaction illustrates that tension and the electromagnetic forces within the material are interconnected. Ultimately, understanding tension involves recognizing the balance of forces at play when an object is distorted or held in equilibrium.
PFuser1232
Messages
479
Reaction score
20
Does the tension force in elastic springs and strings arise inevitably as a consequence of Newton's third law? Or is it due to the electrostatic forces within the material itself? Or are both of these explanations basically the same thing?
 
  • Like
Likes poseidon721
Physics news on Phys.org
You've got it - they are the same thing.

Newton's 3rd law holds "regardless" of how the rope is made, or held together. But in fact almost everything you will ever encounter directly is held together by electromagnetic forces. The exceptions are atomic nuclei, hadrons, and massive objects held together by gravitation - like the Earth or moon.
 
  • Like
Likes poseidon721
UltrafastPED said:
You've got it - they are the same thing.

Newton's 3rd law holds "regardless" of how the rope is made, or held together. But in fact almost everything you will ever encounter directly is held together by electromagnetic forces. The exceptions are atomic nuclei, hadrons, and massive objects held together by gravitation - like the Earth or moon.

But doesn't tension appear only when the spring or string is pulled from both sides?
 
  • Like
Likes poseidon721
MohammedRady97 said:
But doesn't tension appear only when the spring or string is pulled from both sides?

Yes, but it still works that way.

You can treat each individual atom in the spring or string as a tiny spring fastened to its neighbors, and subject to Newton's third law. Tension is when these springs are stretched and compression is when those springs are compressed, and you can't do either unless you're pushing/pulling both ends of the object (if you only push/pull at one end, the forces are imbalanced and the object moves away/towards you instead of compressing/stretching). But either way, each individual atom/spring is being pushed/pulled by its neighbors, and exerting equal and opposit forces on them.

The attachments and forces within and between these 'tiny springs" are the electromagnetic forces you asked about in your original post.
 
  • Like
Likes poseidon721 and PFuser1232
MohammedRady97 said:
But doesn't tension appear only when the spring or string is pulled from both sides?

Yes. If the spring / string has no mass you cannot get any tension in it unless something is attached to the other end. You have to be either distorting something, keeping equilibrium with another external force or accelerating it.
In the same way, you can't 'push' against 'nothing'. Press-ups work as an exercise but Press-downs are useless.
 
  • Like
Likes poseidon721
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
2K
Back
Top