Origins of the Fundamental Interactions/Forces

  • Thread starter Thread starter HeavyWater
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fundamental
AI Thread Summary
The four fundamental interactions—gravity, weak, color, and electromagnetic—are believed by many to result from "phase changes" during the universe's expansion from the quark-gluon plasma, though this is not universally accepted. There is strong confidence that the weak and electromagnetic forces were unified prior to the electroweak phase transition, as evidenced by experimental findings like the Higgs particle discovery. The strong force is also thought to have been unified with the electroweak force before the Grand Unification phase transition, although exact models of this unification remain uncertain. The unification of gravity with the other forces is still a hypothesis, lacking experimental support or a robust theory of quantum gravity. Overall, while there is significant interest and theoretical backing for these ideas, many aspects remain speculative and untested.
HeavyWater
Messages
55
Reaction score
4
Are the four fundamental interactions (or "forces") e.g. gravity, weak, color, electromagnetic believed to be the result of "phase changes" as the universe expanded from the quark-gluon plasma?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Last edited:
HeavyWater said:
Are the four fundamental interactions (or "forces") e.g. gravity, weak, color, electromagnetic believed to be the result of "phase changes" as the universe expanded from the quark-gluon plasma?

This is basically what is believed, but the degree of confirmation is not the same for all the forces. (Also, if all four forces were in fact unified in the very early universe, then the state at that time would not have been a quark-gluon plasma; quarks and gluons would not have been distinct from any other particles at that time. In fact, this would not have been a good description any time before the Grand Unification phase transition; quarks and gluons only became distinct particles when the strong force and the electroweak force separated--see below.)

We are very confident that the weak and electromagnetic forces were unified before the electroweak phase transition, since we can probe energies at or somewhat above the energy of that phase transition experimentally (the LHC discovery of the Higgs particle was a result of this). The electroweak model is an integral part of the Standard Model of particle physics.

We are fairly confident that the strong (color) force was unified with the electroweak force before the Grand Unification phase transition (I think that's the usual name for it), because, although we can't do experiments at or near the estimated energy scale of that transition, extensions of the Standard Model that include it seem to do pretty well on predictions that we can test. But AFAIK it is not currently known exactly which extension of the Standard Model is the right version of grand unification.

The idea that gravity was unified with the other three forces at some point in the very early universe is, at this point, only a reasonable hypothesis. We can't probe energies anywhere near the scale of the phase transition that would have been involved, and we don't even have a good theory of quantum gravity at this point, so we don't have any way of making predictions based on the hypothesis that we can actually test. Many physicists like the idea because it obviously makes things simpler conceptually, but that's as much as we can say.
 
Thanks Rootone and PeterDonis. Your answers were much better than I expected.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top