Orthochorous? Don't think I've heard that term before

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fredrik
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Term
Fredrik
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
10,876
Reaction score
423
An arbitrary Lorentz transformation ##\Lambda## in 1+1 dimensions can be written as
\begin{align}
\Lambda=\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{1-v^2}}
\begin{pmatrix}1 & -v\\ -\rho v & \rho\end{pmatrix}.
\end{align} Here ##\sigma=\operatorname{sgn}\Lambda_{00}## and ##\rho=\det\Lambda##. I learned today that ##\Lambda## is said to be orthochorous if ##\sigma\rho=1##. I don't think I've ever heard that term before. (I found it in Streater & Wightman...which by the way is the second hit if I google the term). Can someone explain this term? Is it standard? What does the "chorous" part refer to? Now that I think about it, I realize that I don't even know what "ortho" means, so I wouldn't mind getting that explained too.

And no, I'm not misspelling "orthochronous". :smile: This is a different word.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In thermodynamics, an 'isochoric' process is one where the volume remains constant, so I'm guessing 'chorous' in orthochorous means volume. And ρ = det Λ is the factor by which the transformation changes volumes.
 
Last edited:
Orthochorous is another subgroup where orthochronus preserves the direction of time. Orthochorus preserves the sign of the volume of space (Lorentz transformations)

http://books.google.ca/books?id=RfR...=0CEMQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=orthochorous&f=false

this link has some of the various subgroups and mathematics involved

edit : its kind of strange that one can find dozens of links describing the subgroups orthochronous, proper, and restricted but finding coverage of orthochorous is almost non existant.
 
Last edited:
Mordred said:
section 6.3 of this article covers some of the sub groups, took a bit to find it hope that helps
It might, but I think I understand the subgroups well enough. I'm mainly concerned with the terminology right now.

Based on what you guys said, it seems likely that some form of the word "chorous" means "volume". Thanks both of you.
 
Well, as per original ancient Greek, it doesn't

<Etymology

The noun isochor and the adjective isochoric are derived from the Greek words ἴσος (isos) meaning "equal", and χώρος (choros) meaning "space."> (from here).

Also χῶρος LSJ, Middle Liddell, Slater, Autenrieth 2.422 0 a definite space, piece of ground, place
χώρα LSJ, Middle Liddell, Slater 15.125 2 space

In addition
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/definitionlookup?type=begin&q=volume&target=greek
 
Last edited:
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top