Orthogonal projection - embarrassed

physical101
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Hi there

I am trying to project some 3D points on to the span of two orthogonal vectors.

v1 = [ -0.1235 -0.9831 0.1352]
v2 = [ 0.7332 -0.1822 -0.6552]

I used the orthogonal projection formula

newpoint = oldpoint-dot(oldpoint,normal(v1,v2))*normal(v1,v2);

but when I plot it in MATLAB I don't get the points projected onto the plane.

Any ideas were I am going wrong?

Cheers

Duane
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Looks right to me. Have you inspected the intermediate results to see where it diverges from what you expect? (You could start with a simpler pair of vectors.) If still stuck, pls post the intermediate results.
 
Hi there,

Thank you for the reply. I went mental yesterday because I knew the math was right and subsequent calculations, such as the within plane angle, were all correct.

The problem I found was with matlabs quiver3 function. It wasn't plotting the vectors correctly and so in the end I made my own and plotted them using + points. Can't put that in a paper lol but at least it demonstrates what I was trying to do.

Thanks again for thinking about this

Duane
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top