Orthogonal transformation problem

Lunat1c
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Lets say I fix 3 mutually orthogonal unit vectors i, j and k. Consider an orthogonal transformation F of vectors defined by F(a_1i+ a_2j + a_3k)=a_1'i+a_2'k+a_3'k where

\left( \begin{array}{ccc} a_1 \\ a_2 \\ a_3\end{array}\right) = A\left( \begin{array}{ccc} a_1' \\ a_2' \\ a_3'\end{array}\right) for a fixed orthogonal matrix A.

How can I show that F(v).F(w)=v.w?

I tried to do this by letting

v = \left( \begin{array}{ccc} a_1 \\ a_2 \\ a_3\end{array}\right), w= \left( \begin{array}{ccc} a_1' \\ a_2' \\ a_3'\end{array}\right)

but the fact that I don't know A is holding me back from doing this, so I think there must be some other approach.

Any help would be much appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I wouldn't use w=\begin{pmatrix} a_1' \\ a_2' \\ a_3'\end{pmatrix} if I were you, since it is not a general vector, it is related to v=\begin{pmatrix} a_1 \\ a_2 \\ a_3\end{pmatrix} by v=Aw. Instead, you want to use a general vector like w=\begin{pmatrix} b_1 \\ b_2 \\ b_3\end{pmatrix}.

What is v\cdot w=v^Tw if v=Av' and w=Aw'[/itex]? What is A^TA for an orthogonal matrix?
 


gabbagabbahey said:
I wouldn't use w=\begin{pmatrix} a_1' \\ a_2' \\ a_3'\end{pmatrix} if I were you, since it is not a general vector, it is related to v=\begin{pmatrix} a_1 \\ a_2 \\ a_3\end{pmatrix} by v=Aw. Instead, you want to use a general vector like w=\begin{pmatrix} b_1 \\ b_2 \\ b_3\end{pmatrix}.

What is v\cdot w=v^Tw if v=Av' and w=Aw'[/itex]? What is A^TA for an orthogonal matrix?
<br /> <br /> Ok, so I&#039;ll name my vectors differently. However how did you get v\cdot w=v^Tw ?<br /> <br /> Also, in reply to your question A^TA=I
 


v\cdot w=v^Tw
this is just a dot product written in matrix notation, the transpose comes about as to satisy matrix multiplication, you must multiply a 1xn matrix (row vector) with a nx1 matrix (column vetcor)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top