Orthogonality of Hermite functions

DavideGenoa
Messages
151
Reaction score
5
Hi, friends! I want to show that Hermite functions, defined by ##\varphi_n(x)=(-1)^n e^{x^2/2}\frac{d^n e^{-x^2}}{dx^n}##, ##n\in\mathbb{N}## are an orthogonal system, i.e. that, for any ##m\ne n##,

##\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{x^2} \frac{d^m e^{-x^2}}{dx^m} \frac{d^n e^{-x^2}}{dx^n}=0 ##​

I have tried by integrating by parts, but I am landing nowhere...
Thank you so much for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you try induction?
 
  • Like
Likes DavideGenoa
You can use the generating function and reduce the whole integral to a doable one.
 
  • Like
Likes DavideGenoa
I note that \int_{-\infty}^\infty \phi_n(x)\phi_m(x)\,dx = \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-x^2}H_n(x)H_m(x)\,dx = 2\sqrt{\pi}n!\delta_{nm}. The second equality can be established by applying Sturm-Liouville theory to the Hermite equation H_n'' - 2xH_n' = -2nH_n.
 
  • Like
Likes DavideGenoa
Thank you all so much!
@dextercioby and pasmith: Regrettably, I do not know anything of Sturm-Liouville theory or generating functions...
@mfb: I am not sure how we could use induction with ##m## and ##n##... I think that integration by parts is the key, but I am not able to manipulate the integral to get the desired result...
 
The best way is the one suggested by pasmith because you won't do any integration.
So I suggest you read Sturm-Liouville theory chapter of Mathematical methods for physicists by Arfken.
 
  • Like
Likes DavideGenoa
pasmith said:
I note that \int_{-\infty}^\infty \phi_n(x)\phi_m(x)\,dx = \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-x^2}H_n(x)H_m(x)\,dx = 2\sqrt{\pi}n!\delta_{nm}. The second equality can be established by applying Sturm-Liouville theory to the Hermite equation H_n'' - 2xH_n' = -2nH_n.

Or, since \phi_n = e^{-\frac12x^2}H_n, substitution yields <br /> \phi_n&#039;&#039; + (1 - x^2)\phi_n = -2n\phi_n. Multiplying by \phi_m and integrating over the real line gives <br /> \int_{-\infty}^\infty \phi_n&#039;&#039;\phi_m + (1 - x^2)\phi_n\phi_m\,dx = -2n\int_{-\infty}^\infty \phi_n \phi_m\,dx.<br /> Integrating the first term on the left by parts twice yields <br /> \int_{-\infty}^\infty \phi_n \phi_m&#039;&#039; + (1 - x^2)\phi_n\phi_m\,dx = -2n\int_{-\infty}^\infty \phi_n \phi_m\,dx<br /> and since \phi_m&#039;&#039; + (1-x^2)\phi_m = -2m\phi_m we have <br /> -2m \int_{-\infty}^\infty \phi_n \phi_m\,dx = -2n\int_{-\infty}^\infty \phi_n \phi_m\,dx or
2(n - m)\int_{-\infty}^\infty \phi_n \phi_m\,dx = 0.
 
  • Like
Likes Quantumjump, DavideGenoa, ShayanJ and 1 other person
DavideGenoa said:
@mfb: I am not sure how we could use induction with ##m## and ##n##... I think that integration by parts is the key, but I am not able to manipulate the integral to get the desired result...
It was a guess, as those things easily transform to n+-1 or m+-1 and so on via partial integration. We have much nicer solutions here now.
 
  • Like
Likes DavideGenoa
I thank you all very much!
 
Back
Top