Orthonormal Energy Eigenstates

nateHI
Messages
145
Reaction score
4
I'm a self learner with a decent math background trying to follow this lecture.



I have been able to follow him perfectly up to this point but at 16:00 Professor Balakrishnan states that "<n|a|n> = 0" because |n-1> is perpendicular to |n>. My question is why and how do we know that an energy eigenstate is perpendicular to another energy eigenstate.

-Nate
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is one of the "standard results" of linear algebra.

For a hermitian operator H, eigenvectors with different eigenvalues
are always orthogonal, while for any eigenvectors with the same eigenvalue
we can use Graham-Schmidt to find an orthogonal basis of the subspace.


Here are some proofs. I don't feel like tex'ing my answers so
I didn't use dirac notation.


H is hermitian if (Y,H.X) =(H.Y,X) for all vectors X,Y
[and (,) is an inner-product s.t. (X,Y) = (Y,X)* {complex conjugate},
and (X, aY) = a(X,Y) {for a scalar a}, so that together we get
(aY,X) = (X,aY)* = (a(X,Y))* = a*(X,Y)*=a*(Y,X), and
i will use H.X to mean H(X) {ie the operator acting on x}]

Let H be a hermitian operator

claim 1 (eigenvals are real)
s'pose X is an eigenvector of H with eigenvalue x so that H.X = xX
then x is real. Since (X,H.X) = (X,xX) = x(X,X) on one hand
on the other (X,H.X)=(H.X,X) = (xX,X) = x*(X,X) on the other.


claim 2 (eigenvectors with different eigenvalues are orthogonal)
let X,Y be eigenvectors of H with eigenvals x,y respectively
and suppose they are different eigenvals.
Then (Y,H.X) = (Y, xX) = x(Y,X)
and also (Y, H.X) = (H.Y, X) = (yY, X) = y(Y,X)
subtracting these we get
(x-y)(Y,X) = 0
and since x-y isn't 0 we have (Y,X)=0.


claim 3. (eigenspaces)
all vectors that have the same eigenvalue of H form a subspace.
pf. check vector space properties . only interesting one is closure
let H.X = xX and H.Y = xY be two vectors
then H.(aX +bY)= aH.X + bH.Y = axX+bxY = x(aX + bY).

thus we can use Graham Schmidt to orthogonalize any basis of
the subspace.
 
That clears up a lot. Thanks!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top