Oscillation of nonrelativistic Strings

moriheru
Messages
273
Reaction score
17

Homework Statement


Calculate the horizontal force dFhorizontal of a string .Show that for small oscillations this force is much smaller than the vertical force dFvertical responsible for the transverse oscillations.
[I apolagize for the way the equations are written]

Homework Equations



dFvertical=T0dy/dx*-T0dy/dx*1
*for x+dx *1 for x

T0(d^2 y/d^2 x)dx=(μ0dx)d^2 y/dt^2

3. The Attempt at a Solution

1.substituting y+dy and y for x+dx and x; substituting dx/dy for dy/dx for horizontal oscillation.
dFhorizontal=T0dx/dy*-T0dx/dy*1
*for y+dy *1 for y
2.exchanging d^2 y/ dx^2 with d^2 x/dy^2 and dx with dy...

T0 (d^2 x/dy^2) dy= (μ0dx)(d^2 x/dt^2)

This is as far as I get. I don't know how to show that the horizontal force is smaller than the vertical force for small oscillations.

Thanks for any clarifications and corrections.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I would instead express the forces (both horizontal and verical) in terms of y(x) and its derivatives wrt x. You can then compare the two with the assumption of small oscillations giving you dy/dx << 1.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top