Oscillations and Elastic Potential Energy

AI Thread Summary
A mass of 1.5 kg oscillates vertically on a spring with a constant of 145 N/m and an amplitude of 8 cm. To calculate elastic potential energy, the distance from the new equilibrium position, determined by mg = -kx, should be used in the formula 1/2kx^2. The gravitational potential energy (GPE) can be calculated by choosing a reference point for zero GPE, with adjustments made for distances from that point. It is emphasized that visualizing the motion aids in understanding the relationships between kinetic energy, gravitational potential energy, and elastic potential energy. Consistency in the chosen reference point is crucial for accurate calculations.
pewpew23
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A mass of 1.5 kg oscillates vertically at the end of a lightweight spring. The spring has a spring constant of 145 Newtons per meter. The amplitude of the motion is 8.00 cm. From this data, complete the table below.

I have to find velocity, acceleration, elastic potential energy, etc. at given points from the equilibrium point.
These points are 8 cm, 6cm, 4cm, 2 cm, 0 cm (equilibrium),... -8 cm


Homework Equations



Elastic Potential= 1/2kx^2
KE=1/2mv^2
GPE=mgh

The Attempt at a Solution



Someone told me that the X you plug into 1/2kx^2 is not the distance from equilibrium in the table. They said that you use the formula F=-kx.
In this case, F=mg so mg=-kx
you solve for X, and this becomes your new equilibrium point.
Then you go through and adjust the rest of the distances from equilibrium so that the closest ones to equilibrium (2 cm previously) are now 2 cm away from this new X.
And this new X is the one you plug into 1/2kx^2 to solve for elastic potential.
Is this correct?

And what values would I use for h to solve for GPE?
Using the X (distance from equilibrium) values given in the table would result in some negative GPE...
Do I make the lowest point equal to 0 cm, and adjust the rest to their distance from the lowest point?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The nice thing is that you get to choose whichever point you want to be zero GPE. As long as you are consistent you'll get the correct answers. You are right that using the EQ point as zero will give some negative GPE values, but that's okay: that just means that the object is gaining KE and/or Spring PE as it loses GPE. And since the points listed are relative to the EQ point, there's no need to adjust them.

I feel that it really helps to picture this thing bouncing up and down in your head - some of the answers, especially for KE, can come easily this way.
 
Okay, so I understand the GPE.

But what about the Elastic Potential?
How do I do that?
Am I supposed to solve for X using mg=-kx?
 
That will give you the distance the spring stretched already (because of the mass on it), in other words, the equilibrium position, which you already found. Just add the additional distances to that (or subtract, for the negative ones) when plugging into the SPE equation.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top