Oscillations, energy conservation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving a bullet embedding into a block attached to a spring, requiring the calculation of the bullet's initial speed and the time for the system to come to rest. Participants emphasize using conservation of momentum for the inelastic collision and highlight that kinetic energy conservation does not apply due to energy loss during the collision. The maximum compression of the spring is addressed as a key factor in determining the system's behavior. Additionally, it's clarified that the system will never truly come to rest if energy is conserved, but rather will momentarily stop at maximum displacement. The conversation underscores the importance of distinguishing between momentum conservation and energy conservation in this context.
Lalasushi
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
A 10g bullet embeds itself in a 0.5kg block which is attached to a spring of force constant 36N/m. If the maximum compression of the spring is 1.5cm, find a)the initial speed of the bullet and b)the time for the bullet-block system to come to rest.

can someone give me some help with the above question? I am not sure how to start it, anyone got any hints to start me off?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lalasushi said:
A 10g bullet embeds itself in a 0.5kg block which is attached to a spring of force constant 36N/m. If the maximum compression of the spring is 1.5cm, find a)the initial speed of the bullet and b)the time for the bullet-block system to come to rest.

can someone give me some help with the above question? I am not sure how to start it, anyone got any hints to start me off?

Hint: Treat the capture of the bullet by the block as a conservation of momentum problem; ignore the spring. Once you have the final momentum, find the velocity; treat the rest of the problem as energy conservation for a harmonic oscillator.
 
b)the time for the bullet-block system to come to rest.
?? If there is no friction and energy really is conserved, the bullet-block will NEVER come to rest.

(By the way, you do NOT have conservation of energy in the original bullet-block collision. Because the bullet embeds itself in the block that is a completely inelastic collision. Conservation of momentum, as Older Dan said, and the fact that the bullet and block have the same speed after the collision will give you that speed.)
 
Use conservation momentum in inelastic collission.Kinetic energy conservation is not possible since some of the energy will be lost in other forms . After you find out the final velocity of the system of both blocks (M). Before you apply conservation of momentum,first claculate the initial expansion of spring due to the mass hanging from it . Then use conservation of energy such that KINETIC ENERGY of single block is converted into compression of spring and kinetic energy of the combined system formed through inelastic collision.

BJ
 
HallsofIvy said:
?? If there is no friction and energy really is conserved, the bullet-block will NEVER come to rest.

It's worded a bit obscurely, but I assume they are looking for the time when the system is momentarily at rest at maximum displacement rather than some final rest condition, which, as you have noted, will never be achieved if energy is conserved.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top