Oscillations of air-track glider

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kalie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oscillations
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the number of oscillations of a damped air-track glider attached to a spring. The glider has a mass of 160 g, a spring constant of 4.40 N/m, and a damping constant of 2.40×10−2 kg/s. The initial amplitude is 23.0 cm, and the goal is to determine how many oscillations occur before the amplitude decays to e^-1 of its initial value. The damped oscillator equation includes both a decaying exponential and an oscillatory component, which are essential for solving the problem. Participants emphasize the need to integrate both aspects to find the total number of oscillations within the specified decay time.
Kalie
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
A 160 g air-track glider is attached to a spring with spring constant 4.40 N/m. The damping constant due to air resistance is 2.40×10−2 kg/s. The glider is pulled out 23.0 cm from equilibrium and released.

How many oscillations will it make during the time in which the amplitude decays to e^-1 of its initial value?

I have no clue how to approach this problems except that
x(t)=Ae^-bt/2m=Ae^-t/2tau
but how can I fin that amount of oscillations?
I'm confused and the dead lines in an hour
please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kalie said:
A 160 g air-track glider is attached to a spring with spring constant 4.40 N/m. The damping constant due to air resistance is 2.40×10−2 kg/s. The glider is pulled out 23.0 cm from equilibrium and released.

How many oscillations will it make during the time in which the amplitude decays to e^-1 of its initial value?

I have no clue how to approach this problems except that
x(t)=Ae^-bt/2m=Ae^-t/2tau
but how can I fin that amount of oscillations?
I'm confused and the dead lines in an hour
please help!
The damped oscillator equation for x(t) has a decaying exponential part and an oscillatory part (sine or cosine). You need both parts to do this problem.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/oscda.html
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top