Oscilloscope to measure Non-Periodic Random Signals....

AI Thread Summary
Using a digital storage oscilloscope (DSO) is essential for capturing non-periodic random signals effectively, as it overcomes the limitations of older analog oscilloscopes. Unlike analog scopes, DSOs can store long sequences of data and utilize advanced trigger functions to accurately capture random signals. The discussion highlights the importance of selecting appropriate trigger settings, such as auto or slope triggers, to ensure accurate representation of the waveform. Users are reassured that modern digital oscilloscopes can handle the complexities of random signals without missing crucial data. Overall, transitioning to digital technology significantly enhances measurement capabilities for non-periodic signals.
fog37
Messages
1,566
Reaction score
108
Hello Forum,

I know a little bit about how the oscilloscope works: an electron beam hits the scope screen and traces the waveform. Once the beam reaches the right side of the screen it zaps back to start tracing again. Is it possible that while the beam returns to the lefthand side of the screen the portion of the signal occurring during that time will not represented>

If the input signal is a sinusoid (periodic), it is important to set the oscilloscope trigger so that the sinusoid is well traced and the beam always starts from the same point. Otherwise we would see many overlapping sinusoids on the screen. The options seem to be auto trigger and slope trigger.

Question: if the input signal is random, non predictable, non periodic, what type of trigger setting do we need to use to correctly capture and trace the signal on the screen? Could we miss part of the random signaI if the beam starts tracing always and only from same point on the lefthand side of the screen? The random signal may start from different points at different times at the left side of the screen...

thanks,
fog37
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You use a digital storage oscilloscope to capture a long sequence of signal data then use search or trigger functions to find the random signal.



Modern scopes are designed to handle this easily.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
fog37 said:
Hello Forum,

I know a little bit about how the oscilloscope works: an electron beam hits the scope screen and traces the waveform. Once the beam reaches the right side of the screen it zaps back to start tracing again. Is it possible that while the beam returns to the lefthand side of the screen the portion of the signal occurring during that time will not represented>

If the input signal is a sinusoid (periodic), it is important to set the oscilloscope trigger so that the sinusoid is well traced and the beam always starts from the same point. Otherwise we would see many overlapping sinusoids on the screen. The options seem to be auto trigger and slope trigger.

Question: if the input signal is random, non predictable, non periodic, what type of trigger setting do we need to use to correctly capture and trace the signal on the screen? Could we miss part of the random signaI if the beam starts tracing always and only from same point on the lefthand side of the screen? The random signal may start from different points at different times at the left side of the screen...

thanks,
fog37

As nsaspook says, a digital oscilloscope does not have the limitations you are mentioning. What you have described is the older analog oscilloscope technology.
 
berkeman said:
As nsaspook says, a digital oscilloscope does not have the limitations you are mentioning. What you have described is the older analog oscilloscope technology.

The King of analog scopes the Tek 2465+ (that I have and love) series had some primitive add-on probes to help with random event triggers but DSO models are light-years ahead of what they could measure.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top