Our Beautiful Universe - Photos and Videos

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on sharing the beauty of the Universe through photos, videos, and animations, emphasizing the aesthetic appeal of space alongside scientific information. Participants are encouraged to post clips and images that comply with mainstream scientific guidelines, avoiding fringe theories. Notable contributions include time-lapse videos from the ISS and clips related to NASA missions, such as the Dawn and New Horizons projects. The thread also highlights the emotional impact of experiencing the vastness of space through visual media. Overall, it celebrates the intersection of art and science in showcasing the wonders of the Universe.
  • #301
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #302
First shot of the moon using the Skywatcher 120mm x 1000mm fl Black Diamond refractor telescope and the ZWO ASI1600MM camera

All my previous moon imaging was with a DSLR camera and telephoto lens

180421 Moon Cap011sm.jpg


Dave
 

Attachments

  • 180421 Moon Cap011sm.jpg
    180421 Moon Cap011sm.jpg
    15.3 KB · Views: 772
  • Like
Likes DennisN and Andy Resnick
  • #303
the imaging setup for the above photo ...

IMG_1300sm.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1300sm.jpg
    IMG_1300sm.jpg
    78.3 KB · Views: 714
  • #304
Recent lunar pic:

DSC_7149-1_zpsq9yji9dd.jpg


Along the centerline is Rima Hyginus (with crater Hyginus), above the rima is Mare Vaporum (the lava flows have only a few hundred meters elevation variation), below the rima are the craters Hyginus A, Triesnecker, and at the base of the 600m high eastern ridge of Murchison, Chladni (which is relevant since we just covered sound in Physics I)
 

Attachments

  • DSC_7149-1_zpsq9yji9dd.jpg
    DSC_7149-1_zpsq9yji9dd.jpg
    37.8 KB · Views: 699
  • Like
Likes DennisN and davenn
  • #305
HI recently I made some scope pictures of Arcturus and Spica.(its quite fuzzy due to long exp. time) but I think that colour difference is remarkable (Arcturus surf temp. cca 4300 K, Spica cca 24000 K).
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-4-24_22-38-30.png
    upload_2018-4-24_22-38-30.png
    41.8 KB · Views: 591
  • upload_2018-4-24_22-39-3.png
    upload_2018-4-24_22-39-3.png
    49.1 KB · Views: 617
  • Like
Likes DennisN and Andy Resnick
  • #306
Tour of the Moon in 4K (NASA Goddard)
Take a virtual tour of the Moon in all-new 4K resolution, thanks to data provided by NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter spacecraft . As the visualization moves around the near side, far side, north and south poles, we highlight interesting features, sites, and information gathered on the lunar terrain.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, davenn and OmCheeto
  • #307
DennisN said:
Tour of the Moon in 4K (NASA Goddard)

very cool :smile:
 
  • #308
The clouds parted for 2 days, and while the moon is annoyingly bright, I was able to get a nice start on M101. The first image includes some surrounding galaxies, while the second is a close-up. Images acquired with a 400/2.8 lens, 15 second exposures (yay, declination!), ISO 500.

M101_DX_16bit-1.tif%20RGB-1_zpspyjvqu8l.jpg


M101_3X_16bit-1.tif%20RGB-3_zpsmg1xzd57.jpg


I can still do a good bit of denoising and improve the flat field correction, but what I really need is less moonlight.
 

Attachments

  • M101_DX_16bit-1.tif%20RGB-1_zpspyjvqu8l.jpg
    M101_DX_16bit-1.tif%20RGB-1_zpspyjvqu8l.jpg
    69.6 KB · Views: 762
  • M101_3X_16bit-1.tif%20RGB-3_zpsmg1xzd57.jpg
    M101_3X_16bit-1.tif%20RGB-3_zpsmg1xzd57.jpg
    60 KB · Views: 674
  • Like
Likes Borg, OmCheeto, davenn and 1 other person
  • #309
Andy Resnick said:
The clouds parted for 2 days, and while the moon is annoyingly bright, I was able to get a nice start on M101. The first image includes some surrounding galaxies, while the second is a close-up. Images acquired with a 400/2.8 lens, 15 second exposures (yay, declination!), ISO 500.

I can still do a good bit of denoising and improve the flat field correction, but what I really need is less moonlight.

nice work, Andy :smile:
 
  • #310
Another good night of viewing- no moon this time. Up to about 2 hours total integration time.

M101_3X_16bit_filtered-1_zps71wacrbc.jpg
 

Attachments

  • M101_3X_16bit_filtered-1_zps71wacrbc.jpg
    M101_3X_16bit_filtered-1_zps71wacrbc.jpg
    32.1 KB · Views: 696
  • Like
Likes Borg, DennisN and davenn
  • #311
10
Hi I attach moon colour enhanced image (registax+photoshop). Are you experienced with this process ? O would like to know if is true that you can visualise true colour of object (for example rock of moon and so on) which can not see by naked eye...

Have nice astro experienceso_O
 

Attachments

  • moon5.jpg
    moon5.jpg
    28 KB · Views: 568
  • #312
bruha said:
10
Hi I attach moon colour enhanced image (registax+photoshop). Are you experienced with this process ? O would like to know if is true that you can visualise true colour of object (for example rock of moon and so on) which can not see by naked eye...

Have nice astro experienceso_O
awesome effort :smile:

just remember tho, the moon isn't really that colourful :wink: ... it's basically all grey

up this thread a few posts back...
Post #302 ... my moon pic and post #304, Andy's pic. show the natural colour of the moon

So in summary ... great detail in your pic., just go easy on the colouring :smile:Dave
 
  • #313
Hi thank for your post. Ya I noticed as well that moon is basically grey (since some green and blue rare rock are present as I read). It is as I read quite lot instruction on web how to enhance image moon colour and just wandering if it is only " game" or has it some relevant (real) matter.
You have absolutely beatiful and detailed images. -congratulation
 
  • #314
bruha said:
You have absolutely beatiful and detailed images. -congratulation

thankyou :smile:

you didn't comment on what telescope, camera etc you used to take that image ?
 
  • #315
bruha said:
Hi thank for your post. Ya I noticed as well that moon is basically grey (since some green and blue rare rock are present as I read). It is as I read quite lot instruction on web how to enhance image moon colour and just wandering if it is only " game" or has it some relevant (real) matter.
You have absolutely beatiful and detailed images. -congratulation

There is real science behind colorimetric imaging of the moon, primarily in connection with minerology:

https://ac.els-cdn.com/001910356490...t=1526472151_debd8bcfa9b5c281b2e39e270b7ac68a
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996SoSyR..30..352O

Enhancing the color (increasing the saturation) is a fairly standard approach:
https://astrophotographylk.wordpress.com/colors-of-the-moon/

The region around Aristarchus is especially colorful:
http://bartoszwojczynski.com/picture-151124-aristarchus
 
  • #316
Hi thank you very much for answer and links- I am interested about this theme so I will study this. My picture was made by hyperion eyepiece 8 mm on Newton 100 x 600 mm and sony compact camera objective just attached through T-ring . But now I got Nikon DS 200 body with bajonet .. so I will hope that made some improvement.:wink:
 
  • #317
Hi
 
  • #318
:rolleyes:Hi I attach my last attempt colour saturated moon image by photoshop- jpg format,( but when I saved as jpg from photoshop it lost almost 50% of saturation- -I do not why and original photoshop is too large-cca 120 MB!). If you could estimate if it could be real colour ...? :nb)
 

Attachments

  • mon9.jpg
    mon9.jpg
    31.8 KB · Views: 550
  • #319
M13 is visible here this time of year:

Hercules_3X_24small_zpsxvn1ajuo.jpg


This was digitally zoomed to mimic a 2400mm focal length (stacking w/ 3X dithering), total integration time 24 minutes @ f/5.6. This cluster has long been difficult (for me) to obtain a decent image: @davenn checked through my work a while ago, and it really helped. Every year I learn improved ways to acquire, stack, denoise, and convert to a 8-bit/channel final image. It's also a good warm-up for imaging the dense starfields in Cygnus in another month or so.
 

Attachments

  • Hercules_3X_24small_zpsxvn1ajuo.jpg
    Hercules_3X_24small_zpsxvn1ajuo.jpg
    44.1 KB · Views: 570
  • Like
Likes DennisN and davenn
  • #320
Andy Resnick said:
M13 is visible here this time of year:
M13 doesn't get above the horizon for me in the southern hemisphere, instead we have the majestic Omega Centauri globular cluster

This is the first deep space object I have imaged through the Skywatcher scope ( the same setup as in post #303 up this page)
Skywatcher 120mm x 1000mm focal length, Black Diamond, refractor telescope and the ZWO ASI1600MM camera
a 2 sec exposure @ F8.3

180519 Omega Centauri Cap009sm.jpg
Dave
 

Attachments

  • 180519 Omega Centauri Cap009sm.jpg
    180519 Omega Centauri Cap009sm.jpg
    61.4 KB · Views: 725
  • Like
Likes DennisN and Andy Resnick
  • #321
Now the Ring Nebula (M57) is viewable from my backyard; here's a full frame (800mm) image of the region, combining images taken this year and last year:

ring_2h-1_zpsowqq76lb.jpg


Note the flat-field correction gets worse at the periphery, where image fields don't overlap anymore. Even so, the correction is pretty good over the entire field. Here's a 1:1 crop of the nebula and surrounding region:

ring_2h-2_zpsbfsqtiyz.jpg


IC 1296 is (barely) visible. Now what I've learned imaging Hercules is paying off: here's a 3X version of the nebula, clearly showing the 14m white dwarf at the center:

ring_3X_50m.tif%20RGB-1_zpsmcp9ljlj.jpg


and a cluster nearly shows that my image can clearly distinguish stars 4.0 arcsec apart (the short vertical group, distance data from Aladin)

ring_3X_50m.tif%20RGB-2_zpsyfmbdpmu.jpg


4.0 arcsec corresponds to a diffraction-limited aperture of 3.1 cm (500 nm wavelength). If we let the 'limit' go down to 3 arcsec (since the stars are clearly separated), the aperture diameter is given as 4.2 cm. Since my lens has an aperture of 14 cm, the impact of poor seeing is quite obvious.
 

Attachments

  • ring_3X_50m.tif%20RGB-2_zpsyfmbdpmu.jpg
    ring_3X_50m.tif%20RGB-2_zpsyfmbdpmu.jpg
    14.6 KB · Views: 476
  • ring_3X_50m.tif%20RGB-1_zpsmcp9ljlj.jpg
    ring_3X_50m.tif%20RGB-1_zpsmcp9ljlj.jpg
    22.4 KB · Views: 493
  • ring_2h-2_zpsbfsqtiyz.jpg
    ring_2h-2_zpsbfsqtiyz.jpg
    37.9 KB · Views: 588
  • ring_2h-1_zpsowqq76lb.jpg
    ring_2h-1_zpsowqq76lb.jpg
    50.5 KB · Views: 564
  • Like
Likes davenn, DennisN and Borg
  • #322
Andy Resnick said:
Now the Ring Nebula (M57) is viewable from my backyard; here's a full frame (800mm) image of the region, combining images taken this year and last year:

great shots, Andy :smile:
 
  • #323
Hi, really great shots!
I attach my attempt of Jupiter, but it is not satisfying.. First is made by compact Sony just pressed to hyperion ocular 8 mm (probably one moon is visible as well)
and second is made by Nikon D 200 body attached by bayonet to hyperion (it is quite dissapointment- I set ISO to 1600 and exp. time to 1/4 sec.(shorter time show nothing on display) .. If somebody have some advice for improving of Jupiter image I will appreciate,,, o_O:wink:
 

Attachments

  • J a m.jpg
    J a m.jpg
    5.7 KB · Views: 509
  • DSC_0015.JPG
    DSC_0015.JPG
    6.9 KB · Views: 500
  • #325
  • #327
live feed active now

some space walking happening

 
  • #328
Final results (for this year) of the Ring nebula; 3.5 hours total integration time at ISO 1600.

Whole field of view:

Ring_3h_30m_filtered_s_zpseto5mvb5.jpg


1:1 crop (no dithering):

Ring_11h_filtered_zpsbpaodemq.jpg


In related news, I have the opportunity to buy myself a present- I've had my eye on a 105/1.4 lens to replace my 85/1.4 that I lost due to migrating from a Sony camera to a Nikon camera two years ago. Hopefully I'll get it in time for imaging Cygnus this year. Stay tuned!
 

Attachments

  • Ring_3h_30m_filtered_1_zpsji3eufrk.jpg
    Ring_3h_30m_filtered_1_zpsji3eufrk.jpg
    23.5 KB · Views: 411
  • Ring_3h_30m_filtered_s_zpseto5mvb5.jpg
    Ring_3h_30m_filtered_s_zpseto5mvb5.jpg
    84.2 KB · Views: 560
  • Ring_11h_filtered_zpsbpaodemq.jpg
    Ring_11h_filtered_zpsbpaodemq.jpg
    11.5 KB · Views: 501
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes davenn, Borg, DennisN and 1 other person
  • #330
Hi I attach my recent attempt of Saturn images (by mobile camera on eyepiece hyperion). I was trying this method beacouse I can not catch it by Nikon body camera attached by bayonet. If somebody has some advice and experience of Saturn photo I would appreciated it.. :smile:
Thanks and have nice days
 

Attachments

  • s2.jpg
    s2.jpg
    10.2 KB · Views: 408
  • s3.jpg
    s3.jpg
    10.2 KB · Views: 414
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, Andy Resnick and davenn

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K