Our Beautiful Universe - Photos and Videos

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on sharing the beauty of the Universe through photos, videos, and animations, emphasizing the aesthetic appeal of space alongside scientific information. Participants are encouraged to post clips and images that comply with mainstream scientific guidelines, avoiding fringe theories. Notable contributions include time-lapse videos from the ISS and clips related to NASA missions, such as the Dawn and New Horizons projects. The thread also highlights the emotional impact of experiencing the vastness of space through visual media. Overall, it celebrates the intersection of art and science in showcasing the wonders of the Universe.
  • #1,831
Another excellent weekend, I had three chances to try out the various suggestions. Unfortunately, I have mixed results. To be fair, I've also noticed that over time, I have been setting more and more stringent requirements on the images I retain for stacking.

The two main things I tried this weekend were: better alignment and better mount balancing. Again, here's my starting point- a stack of consecutive images (@400%) showing oscillatory behavior in right ascension (RA, vertical) and drift in both declination (DEC, horizontal) and RA:

MAX_bad photos_10_24_22-1.jpg


At 400%, these RA oscillations are around 250 pixels, corresponding to 1.6 arcmin actual angular motion. Not sure if that's within spec.

One of the challenges is the lack of a meaningful user guide for the GoTo drive. The drive does output some useful metrics- I get live updates for 'mount balancing' and 'alignment model parameters'. If you check out those sites, you will note the relative lack of useful information- those URLs are the Gemini manual.

Mount balancing:
The GM8 user guide is pretty clear about the mount balancing procedure- mount the scope and adjust the position of either the telescope on the sliding dovetail (for DEC) or the counterweight (RA) until the mount holds a static position.

One clue I have about the possible underlying problem is while I have to position the telescope dovetail accurately to within 1 mm for DEC balancing, I can slide the counterweights within a 2-inch range of travel and the mount still stays (apparently) balanced. That is, the DEC axis rotates very freely but the RA axis seems 'resistive'. It's worth mentioning that the GM8 manual suggests leaving the mount slightly unbalanced... "This is done so that the worm gear is pushing against the slight load", resulting in improved tracking.

Looking at the GoTo drive output, the numbers have been very resistant to change- the 'Y' balance (DEC) stays at a constant 6% and a -2 offset, while the RA ('X' balance) rapidly oscillates between 6%-10% (poor hard-working jalopy motor!) and with the same -2 or -3 offset. Those numbers don't change, regardless of how well (or intentionally poorly) I balance the mount. I do understand what the PWM % numbers mean but have no clue what the 'offset' means- and I believe the important readout quantity is 'offset' which should be close to 0.

So on different nights, I moved the counterweights to different positions to see if there was any observable effect, first is with the counterweight too close to the mount (telescope heavy) and the other with the counterweight too far from the mount (counterweights heavy):

MAX_bad photos_10_29_22_1_in_from_bottom_4X.jpg

MAX_10_29_22_late_4X.jpg


No substantive difference, the oscillations in RA are the same magnitude- 250 pixels (plus or minus). The reduction in DEC drift is discussed below...

One possible cause of the RA oscillations would be friction (somewhere) in the RA drivetrain, I think it's called 'stiction'. Although I store it with a dust cover, some of the gearing mechanisms may need to be cleaned after 10 years of use, but I'm not sure which. I've taken the thing apart before, so maybe I have a project...

Mount alignment:
One thing I tried did (minimally) impact the RA oscillation amplitude: better alignment. After I aligned to the same few stars 3 or 4 times, the model fully populated its parameters and the mount balancing changed- the DEC PWM was reduced to around 2% and the offset was 1, the RA PWM was still bouncing between 6-10% but the offset was also around 1. Here's what resulted:

MAX_bad photos_10_27_22_1_in_from_bottom_4X.jpg

These RA oscillations are around 200 pixels, which is better. Also, the RA drift is gone. Now, I'm not sure why (electronic) improved alignment impacts (mechanical) balancing, but that's what the drive output indicated.

Anyhoo... here's an updated image with Neptune and Triton:

Neptune_2022-crop-St copy.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN and collinsmark
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #1,832
Devin-M said:
The teleconverter can take it out of balance in both DEC and RA because it adjusts the weight of the whole camera (affecting the RA) but it also moves the center of gravity away from the lens’s mounting hole (affecting the DEC). Take the camera + lens + teleconverter off the mount and put a pencil on its side on the floor and under the lens’s mounting hole (pencil on its side perpendicular to the lens) and see if its actually in balance at the mounting hole like a see saw. If not you may need the macro focusing rail to move the center of gravity relative to the mounting hole on the bottom of the macro focusing rail.
Thanks for the suggestion- the lens is mounted to a dovetail that mates to the GM8 and by sliding the dovetail back and forth, I achieve DEC balance. Since I have to do this every night I image, adding or removing the tele is always accounted for.
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
  • #1,833
Problem solved!

Before opening up the mount- a potentially risky step- I looked around on other discussion boards (e.g. cloudynights.com) for discussions about similar tracking issues and based on what I found, I realized I still hadn't done all of the basic check-out steps. Specifically, I didn't measure the periodicity of the RA oscillations to identify the 'defective part'.

When I did, I found the periodicity is exactly equal to the period of the worm drive: 8 minutes. This means that the RA oscillations are purely due to 'periodic error', although there could be additional low-amplitude higher order frequency components present in the error signal. So last night I carefully contorted myself and performed 2 rounds of manual guided PEC (periodic error correction), with pretty good results- I am now retaining close to 30% of my images, up from 10%. And, since the 'best' images are significantly improved as well, the overall stacked image quality is now doubly-improved. A few more PEC rounds should really clean up the tracking.

I also tightened the clutches as much as possible, but given how well I have been balancing everything, that didn't make mush of a difference.

Woot! Thanks to everyone for their suggestions!
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes vanhees71, collinsmark and DennisN
  • #1,834
Andy Resnick said:
with pretty good results- I am now retaining close to 30% of my images, up from 10%. And, since the 'best' images are significantly improved as well, the overall stacked image quality is now doubly-improved. A few more PEC rounds should really clean up the tracking.
Congratulations! :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes Andy Resnick
  • #1,835
Have you considered tracking with a small guide scope/camera & maybe something like an ASIAir Pro?
 
  • #1,836
Devin-M said:
Have you considered tracking with a small guide scope/camera & maybe something like an ASIAir Pro?
I have considered a few models a while ago (Orion makes some nice ones, for example) and rejected the idea for a few reasons, for example:

1) Increased complexity. For example, I don't want to set up a computer every time I go image.
2) No obvious way to mount a tracking scope on my setup without re-engineering the saddle plate and dovetail
 
  • #1,837
Andy Resnick said:
I have considered a few models a while ago (Orion makes some nice ones, for example) and rejected the idea for a few reasons, for example:

1) Increased complexity. For example, I don't want to set up a computer every time I go image.
2) No obvious way to mount a tracking scope on my setup without re-engineering the saddle plate and dovetail

1) The ASIAir Pro lets you control the autoguiding and targeting from your phone without a laptop

2) Here’s an idea… I did this with a macro focusing rail (imagine a small guiding scope instead of the laser pointer)

185E0ED8-AC34-416B-BF88-49905396E1E1.jpeg

785D96CB-C5F9-4193-9C0D-7A088C5D8C83.jpeg

(I used one macro focusing rail to move the camera’s center of mass to balance the declination axis with the 2x teleconverter on, and a second macro focusing rail under the 1st to side mount the laser pointer or alternately a guide scope.)

https://www.adorama.com/mcfrss.html
 
  • #1,838
2.11. I made some pictures with my small telescope (Newton 600 x 100 mm) with eyepiece camera bresser from window (bad light condition of course furthemore already cca half moon was present)... last four images are Gimp corrected... :frown::smile:
 

Attachments

  • Capture_00014.jpg
    Capture_00014.jpg
    4.2 KB · Views: 97
  • Capture_00014G.jpg
    Capture_00014G.jpg
    4.1 KB · Views: 103
  • Capture_00014G2.jpg
    Capture_00014G2.jpg
    4.1 KB · Views: 88
  • Capture_00040G.jpg
    Capture_00040G.jpg
    26.6 KB · Views: 90
  • Capture_00047G.jpg
    Capture_00047G.jpg
    16.1 KB · Views: 101
  • Like
Likes Andy Resnick, DennisN and collinsmark
  • #1,839
IC 5146, The Cocoon Nebula (also called Caldwell 19, SH 2-125, and Barnard 168), captured from my back patio in late September-October, 2022.

Cocoon2022_Final_SmallForPF.jpg


Have you been lying low lately, gathering your strength, perhaps undergoing a process of metamorphosis (so to speak), knowing soon you'll spring forth as a beautiful butterfly? If so, then the IC 5146 may be just the nebula for you.

The Cocoon Nebula lies in the constellation Cygnus (the swan) and is about 3300 light-years away (sources differ slightly on the distance).

Equipment:
Meade 10" LX200-ACF fork mounted on an equatorial wedge.
Starlight Instruments FTF2008BCR focuser modified for electronic focusing.
Off-axis guider (OAG) with ZWO ASI174MM-mini guide camera.
Baader 3.5-4 nm Ultra-Narrowband filter set.
ZWO ASI6200MM-Pro main camera.

Software:
Nighttime Imaging "N" Astronomy (N.I.N.A.)
PHD2 guiding (of course)
PixInsight
Topaz Labs Denoise AI
Topaz Labs Sharpen AI

Integration:
Bortle class 7 (maybe 8) skies
All subframes binned 3×3
SII: 71×10 min = 11.83 hrs
Hα: 76×10 min = 12.66 hrs
Oiii: 74×10 min = 12.33 hrs
Total integration time: 36.83 hours
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Love
Likes pinball1970, davenn, Andy Resnick and 5 others
  • #1,840
The moon, Jupiter, and 22° halo:

DSC_9881 copy_small.jpeg


Shot @ 15/4, 30s ISO 64. Image cropped but otherwise straight-from-camera jpg.
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Wow
Likes pinball1970, davenn, collinsmark and 1 other person
  • #1,841
Hi, here is two images of three sunspots as I catch them 8.11.-image 1 is by SV Ebony camera 1.25"
and image 2 is by Bresser full HD deep sky camera 1.25" -with green filter both
lot of succes :smile: :confused:
 

Attachments

  • Sunspots.jpg
    Sunspots.jpg
    12.9 KB · Views: 90
  • Sunspots2.jpg
    Sunspots2.jpg
    17 KB · Views: 95
  • Like
Likes collinsmark, vanhees71 and DennisN
  • #1,842
In a strange, inverted, turn of events, I had to wait until there was a break in the clear nights to catch up :)

This time of year I can image 4 planets each night- First, Neptune (and Triton) (50% downscaled):

Neptune_2022-St.jpg


Jupiter and 4 Galilean moons (composite, 100%):

DSC_4628_2.jpg


Mars (100%)- nothing amazing, but whatevs:

DSC_4723.jpeg


and Uranus (with 2 moons, not sure which... maybe Umbriel and Titania), 100%:

Uranus_2022-St.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, collinsmark, Borg and 1 other person
  • #1,843
NGC 7822 captured from my back patio in October, 2022.

NGC7822_2022_Final_SmallForPF.jpg


The portion of NGC 7822, as shown here, is part of a larger nebula commonly called "The Question Mark Nebula," that resembles a giant question mark ("?"). You can't see the question mark here because the image is "zoomed in" too much, so to speak. The image here is only the central region of the nebula.

It was difficult for me to process this image simply because there's so much going on in this region of space. I kept getting lost.

Equipment:
Meade 10" LX200-ACF fork mounted on an equatorial wedge.
Starlight Instruments FTF2008BCR focuser modified for electronic focusing.
Off-axis guider (OAG) with ZWO ASI174MM-mini guide camera.
Baader 3.5-4 nm Ultra-Narrowband filter set.
ZWO ASI6200MM-Pro main camera.

Software:
Nighttime Imaging "N" Astronomy (N.I.N.A.)
PHD2 guiding (of course)
PixInsight
Topaz Labs Denoise AI
Topaz Labs Sharpen AI

Integration:
Bortle class 7 (maybe 8 ) skies
All subframes binned 3×3
SHO mapping
SII: 75×10 min = 12.5 hrs
Hα: 81×10 min = 13.5 hrs
Oiii: 63×10 min = 10.5 hrs
Total integration time: 36.5 hours
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Likes Borg, Bystander, Devin-M and 2 others
  • #1,844
collinsmark said:
NGC 7822 captured from my back patio in October, 2022.
Simply gorgeous! The colors and details are stunning! :smile:
And there's a lot going on in the image, many different things to look at! :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
  • #1,845
Astrophotography accessories

Here's a report on some accessories for astrophotography with system cameras. Some of you may already have sufficient/equivalent gear but I wanted to share these things since it may give some ideas to someone :smile:.

Star Focusing Mask (homebuilt)

An upgraded and even lighter version (previous version here) of a homebuilt star focusing mask which is made of a perforated plastic screen on a cardboard frame:

01 - Star Focusing Mask.jpg


I've fastened a small piece of sleeping mat to it, so I can just quickly hang it on any of my lenses:

02 - Star Focusing Mask.jpg


I wanted to report that I've tested it "in the field", and this solution works well with real stars, and actually better than I personally expected :smile:.SmallRig (various gear)

SmallRig (https://www.smallrig.com/, also available on Amazon) is a clever solution for mounting a large variety of accessories to a camera. The SmallRig accessories I show below are all made from aluminium alloy and they are quite lightweight and not too pricey, in my opinion.

I'm quite impressed and satisfied with the system.

For me it solved the following tasks for astrophotography:
  • Lens support for longer/heavier lenses
  • A way to attach a motorized focusing mechanism (which I've planned building)
  • Live guiding possible with smartphone attached (an idea I got)
The system can of course be used for other non-astro things, e.g. attaching external lights and microphones to the gear.

1. You start with a cage which fits your particular camera:
(the cage has a large number of 1/4 inch and 3/8 inch threaded holes which let you attach other gear to the cage)

SmallRig cage with Sony A6000 mounted:
11 - SmallRig - Cage.jpg


2. Then you can mount various things to the cage...

SmallRig Baseplate attached to the cage:
12 - SmallRig - Baseplate.jpg


Two aluminium rods attached to the baseplate:
(on these rods I can attach other gear for the lenses themselves)

13 - SmallRig - Rods.jpg


A movable clamp attached to the rods:
(on this one I will mount my planned motorized focusing mechanism)

14 - SmallRig - Clamp.jpg


A movable lens support for long/heavy lenses attached to the rods:
15 - SmallRig - Lens Support.jpg


A smartphone holder which can be rotated left/right and forwards/backwards...

17 - SmallRig - Smartphone Holder.jpg


...which allows the smartphone to be rotated* to be directed at the eyes even though the camera is pointing upwards at a small angle...

18 - SmallRig - Phone mounted.jpg


...or a large angle (almost straight upwards here, and with the Android astronomy app SkEye running on the phone):

19 - SmallRig - SkEye running.jpg


* The app SkEye can be calibrated ("Indirect mode" -> "Alignment") so it shows what the camera in the cage is pointing at (when the smartphone has been rotated with respect to the camera in the cage).

It works exactly like I thought and with this solution you get live guiding to targets in the night sky :smile::

Sony A6000 in a SmallRig cage with a smartphone mounted and running SkEye:


You can also zoom in on the app to show a more magnified portion of the night sky.

It's not full GoTo of course, but I think it's very useful for me, at least. I have not tested it "in the field" yet, but I expect it to work as I thought. I think it will make it much easier to find targets in the night sky :smile:.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Andy Resnick, collinsmark and Bystander
  • #1,846
Hi, Saturn and Jupiter with 3 moons made by Newton 1000x200 mm and eyepiece camera SV EBONY
on Saturday , South Bohemia (countryside but with light pollution cca Bortle 6. im. with ---g are Gimp corrected. (I was not able more decreased Saturn exposition in order to see belts... :confused: :confused:)
Lot of succes:wink::smile:
 

Attachments

  • Capture_00051G.jpg
    Capture_00051G.jpg
    4 KB · Views: 99
  • Capture_00051.jpg
    Capture_00051.jpg
    4.1 KB · Views: 89
  • Capture_00014.jpg
    Capture_00014.jpg
    3.6 KB · Views: 106
  • Capture_00010G.jpg
    Capture_00010G.jpg
    2.8 KB · Views: 102
  • Capture_00010.jpg
    Capture_00010.jpg
    3.9 KB · Views: 104
  • Capture_00007g.jpg
    Capture_00007g.jpg
    3.7 KB · Views: 98
  • Capture_00007.jpg
    Capture_00007.jpg
    3.7 KB · Views: 110
  • Capture_00005G.jpg
    Capture_00005G.jpg
    3.8 KB · Views: 101
  • Capture_00005.jpg
    Capture_00005.jpg
    3.9 KB · Views: 89
  • Like
Likes Andy Resnick, collinsmark, pinball1970 and 1 other person
  • #1,847
It's been cloudy for a week and there's another week to go, so this is as far as I go for the year with M31 (Andromeda galaxy):
Result of M31_Andromeda-St-50678s copy.jpeg


M31 just barely fits in the frame @800mm (35mm image format). The image is still a little too noisy, I need another pass or two to get sufficient integration time.

deets: 800/8 (100mm refractor) Nikkor and Nikon D810 on Losmandy GM-8, 14 very-hard-won hours :) @10s subs. APP for stacking.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes vanhees71, collinsmark, pinball1970 and 4 others
  • #1,848
Andy Resnick said:
so this is as far as I go for the year with M31 (Andromeda galaxy):
Gorgeous! 🙂
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and berkeman
  • #1,849
Andy Resnick said:
It's been cloudy for a week and there's another week to go, so this is as far as I go for the year with M31 (Andromeda galaxy):
Beautiful. May I download that to use as my background on my phone and laptop?
 
  • #1,850
Beautiful !
Can I ask what is mygnifying of this image?
 
  • #1,851
berkeman said:
Beautiful. May I download that to use as my background on my phone and laptop?
Thanks! Certainly! (thanks for asking first :) )
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN, vanhees71 and berkeman
  • #1,852
bruha said:
Beautiful !
Can I ask what is mygnifying of this image?
Thanks!

Regarding magnification, 800mm provides about 16X magnification, using the convention that a 50mm lens is matched to the field of view of a naked eye.
 
  • #1,853
Thank you :smile: :smile: 👍
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #1,854
Made by my friend (half professional photographer)':

The brightest star is Deneb from the constellation Cygnus, and to the left of it the Pelican Nebula and North America can be seen.
...
Technique: Sony A7, Samyang 135/2, SW Star Adventurer, UHC Astronomik filter
Exposure: 150x40sec
Post-processing: AstroPixelProcessor, PixInsight, Photoshop
 

Attachments

  • cygnus-1.jpg
    cygnus-1.jpg
    84.6 KB · Views: 92
  • Like
Likes collinsmark, DennisN and Ibix
  • #1,855
NGC 281, the Pac-Man Nebula, captured from my back patio from late Oct through the first part of Nov, 2022. The nebula is found in the constellation Cassiopeia, and is about 9,200-9,500 light-years away (sources vary).

Pacman2022_Final_SmallForPF.jpg


Its common name is the "Pac-Man" nebula, presumably due to the fact that, at a glance, it sort of looks like the 1980 video arcade game character, "Pac-Man." (Tilt you head and blur your eyes, if it helps.)

It obviously wasn't always called the "Pac-Man" nebula; it was discovered by American astronomer Edward Emerson Barnard (most famous for Barnard's Star, the star with the highest proper motion in the night sky) in 1883. It just goes to show that the common names of astronomical objects are not set in stone, and can evolve over time. (Edit: Even today, the nebula is frequently called "Pacman," without the hyphen.)

Looking at NGC 281 in more detail, there are features within the nebulosity that the brain might interpret as facial features, such as a human eye (upper-center), and maybe an ear. Also a mouth & chin, perhaps? Cheekbones?

Equipment:
Meade 10" LX200-ACF fork mounted on an equatorial wedge.
Starlight Instruments FTF2008BCR focuser modified for electronic focusing.
Off-axis guider (OAG) with ZWO ASI174MM-mini guide camera.
Baader 3.5-4 nm Ultra-Narrowband filter set.
ZWO ASI6200MM-Pro main camera.

In the 1980 video game, Pac-Man was chased by ghosts.

Software:
Nighttime Imaging "N" Astronomy (N.I.N.A.)
PHD2 guiding (of course)
PixInsight
Topaz Labs Sharpen AI

My back patio is called the Shady Crypt Observatory.

Integration:
Bortle class 7 (maybe 8 ) skies
All subframes binned 3×3
SHO mapping
SII: 78×10 min = 13.0 hrs
Hα: 75×10 min = 12.5 hrs
Oiii: 67×10 min = 11.17 hrs
Total integration time: 36.67 hours
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
  • Wow
Likes DennisN, Devin-M, Bystander and 4 others
  • #1,856
collinsmark said:
Looking at NGC 281 in more detail, there are features within the nebulosity that the brain might interpret as facial features, such as a human eye (upper-center), and maybe an ear. Also a mouth & chin, perhaps? Cheekbones?
That's what I saw first. Like something out of a sci-fi movie. Beautiful pictures as always.
:bow:
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark and Ibix
  • #1,857
collinsmark said:
Looking at NGC 281 in more detail, there are features within the nebulosity that the brain might interpret as facial features, such as a human eye (upper-center), and maybe an ear. Also a mouth & chin, perhaps? Cheekbones?
I see that but, to me, the whole thing kinda looks like a blue version of the Eye of Sauron.
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
  • #1,858
It's Mars season again!

Here's my latest Mars image from the back patio:
2022-11-30-0851_0_Mars_Final_ForPF.jpg

Mars. Midpoint timestamp: 2022-11-30 08:51.0 UT.

Mars is at its closest approach right now. So if you if you want to get a good look at Mars, now is the time. Any time this week is good (see more below about the occultation event), but now is a good time.

Mars reaches opposition on December 7th (or the morning of December 8th, depending on your location)

If you're wondering why closest approach doesn't quite align with opposition, it's because Earth's and Mars' orbits are elliptical and are not exactly on the same plane.

The Moon will occult Mars on the evening of Dec. 7th or morning of Dec. 8th, depending on your location, for much of the Northern Hemisphere. So mark you calendar for that!
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/on-december-7-the-moon-will-photobomb-mars/

Image details:

Equipment:
Meade 10" LX200-ACF fork mounted on an equatorial wedge.
Explore Scientific 1.25" 3x Focal Extender
ZWO ASI585MC camera

Software:
FireCapture (for acquisition)
AutoStakkert! (for lucky imaging processing and stacking
RegiStax (for wavelet sharpening)
PixInsight (for miscellaneous image processing)
WinJupos (for derotation and additional stacking of sharpened images)

Acquisition:
Exposure time per frame: about 9 milliseconds.
Eight separate, 2 minute videos were taken.
Seeing: Nothing to write home about.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes russ_watters, vanhees71, Borg and 1 other person
  • #1,859
collinsmark said:
Mars is at its closest approach right now. So if you if you want to get a good look at Mars, now is the time. Any time this week is good (see more below about the occultation event), but now is a good time.
Thanks for the advice!

I would have a go at looking or even try photographing it (even though I expect it to be just a pretty small dot with my equipment). But the skies here go in fifty shades of grey, and they've done so for quite a while. And the forecast looks crappy too.

By the way, I've currently got a 3x teleconverter on the way to me. I don't know how it will perform, but we'll see. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
  • #1,860
Hi, beautiful mage (what is magnification?)
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K