Our Beautiful Universe - Photos and Videos

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on sharing the beauty of the Universe through photos, videos, and animations, emphasizing the aesthetic appeal of space alongside scientific information. Participants are encouraged to post clips and images that comply with mainstream scientific guidelines, avoiding fringe theories. Notable contributions include time-lapse videos from the ISS and clips related to NASA missions, such as the Dawn and New Horizons projects. The thread also highlights the emotional impact of experiencing the vastness of space through visual media. Overall, it celebrates the intersection of art and science in showcasing the wonders of the Universe.
  • #2,041
Actually, could you do about 10 flat frames? Just stretch white plastic bag over lens with a couple rubber bands and point at sky during daytime (not at sun) such that the exposure ends up about 50% grey. Histogram will look like a peak in the middle.
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2,042
Devin-M said:
Actually, could you do about 10 flat frames? Just stretch white plastic bag over lens with a couple rubber bands and point at sky during daytime (not at sun) such that the exposure ends up about 50% grey. Histogram will look like a peak in the middle.

@Devin-M :

Ok, I just did some flat frames (20) and uploaded them as a RAR archive ("Milky Way from DennisN to Devin-M - Flat Frames.rar", 701 MB) on your pCloud link.

I hope I did it right :smile: :

Gear: Same camera and lens (of course :smile:)
ISO: Same (3200)
f: Same (4)
Exposure: 1/8000s with a paper* in front of lens, to get correct exposure
Focus: Same (Infinity)

I had to read up on flat frames, and I read this article:

How to take Flat Frames for Astrophotography (AstroBackyard)

* I tried with a plastic bag first, but it seemed to thin, since the photo got overexposed even on the shortest exposure time:

Plastic bag.jpg


So I tried with a paper in front of the lens instead (taped onto the camera):

Paper (1).jpg


Paper (2).jpg


Cheers! :smile:
 
  • #2,043
Test cropped image from a large stitched-and-stacked image of the Virgo supercluster ( I think that's what it is...), this crop is centered on Markarian's chain and neighborhood:

Virgo_long-crop-crop-St copy.jpg


It's ok, but the seams are unacceptable. Tests like this help me diagnose stacking problems (here, it's insufficient blending of the substacks) but also keep me motivated to see large projects through to the end.

Deets: total integration time is about 20 hours @ 400/4, 13s subs, but it's spread over the whole region which covers about 5 FoV of a full-frame 35mm sensor. This crop is close to a single FoV.
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark, timmdeeg and DennisN
  • #2,044
It’s really nice and includes the Great Galactic Face.
 
  • #2,045
https://mapstr.com/place/JNuKeafrwog

During a trip in the south of Malta we came along a historic tower - the Ghar Lapsi Tower - and I imagined stars looking down on it. At night it took us a half hour from Valetta to arrive at the tower.

Unfortunately fainter stars were missing due to dust coming from the desert Sahara, so only SQM 19.

Sony A7iii with FE 1.8 / 14 GM
stacked with Sequator - processed with Siril and LightZone
May 18. - 18x25s ISO 200 no guiding

I have no great experience to process such images. Which would you prefer? I think the second looks more natural. Both are a slight crop.

1685259174573.jpeg


1685259246949.jpeg
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN and collinsmark
  • #2,046
timmdeeg said:
Unfortunately fainter stars were missing due to dust coming from the desert Sahara, so only SQM 19.

Sony cameras are known to use a spatial filtering algorithm that removes stars (and by design hot pixels), known in the astrophotography community as “star eater” cameras…

https://www.markshelley.co.uk/Astronomy/SonyA7S/sonystareater.html
 
  • #2,047
Source: https://www.lonelyspeck.com/sony-star-eater-and-how-to-fix-it/

Improvements in the Sony a7III

The below section is an excerpt from my a7III review.

The a7III exhibits a similar, but different characteristic noise filtering as previous generations. The filtering reduces noise and diminishes the brightness of small dim stars in an image for exposures of 4 seconds or longer. An easy way to see the effects of star-eater on the a7III is to simply compare a 3.2s exposure (left) with a 4s exposure (right):


sony-a7iii-star-eater-example.jpg

A comparison between a 3.2s exposure and a 4s exposure makes apparent that the a7III still has some built-in noise reduction that affects stars.

https://www.lonelyspeck.com/sony-star-eater-and-how-to-fix-it/
 
  • #2,048
Thanks, I wasn't aware of the "star eater" issue.

This sounds like an improvement though:

As you can see, the 8s a7III (right) shot looks a lot better than the star-eaten a7S Bulb shot (left). The a7S Bulb shot (left) shows some weird color shifted or blocky looking stars that appear a little bit defocused as a results of the old a7S’s spatial filtering (star-eater) in Bulb mode. The a7III shot shows more dim stars and stars appear markedly sharper than in the old a7S Bulb shot. Stars look “normal” in the a7III shot. This result is great news for astrophotographers looking to get the a7III.

I'm not sure if I can expect more if under such conditions I can see only a few stars with the naked eye.
 
  • #2,049
A new video by Nico Carver which I think is worth posting because it is unusual;
he talks about psychological issues here which can affect astrophotographers (and photographers in general):

Pixel peeping (which can lead to unnecessary dissatisfaction) and GAS (Gear Acquisition Syndrome)*.

Confession: I've become a pixel peeper (Nebula Photos)


* GAS (Gear Acquisition Syndrome) and LBA (Lens Buying Addiction) are concepts in photography which I can identify with :smile:. Here is a short video which describes it: LBA and GAS - a journey (Simon's Utak).
 
  • #2,050
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Likes neilparker62, DennisN, collinsmark and 2 others
  • #2,051
After clear sky has been very rare for quite a long time we now had some nights with SQM > 20 for about 3 hours, so I took the chance to capture M51 with surroundings and Hickson 68 with NGC 5371 (upper right corner).

M51 surroundings
Galaxy - Distance Mly - remark (source Wikipedia)

NGC 5198 - 116
NGC 5173 - 112
NGC 5169 - 113
NGC 5229 - 20 - Typ LSB, Low Surface Brightness Galaxy
IC 4284 - 822 - Redshift 0,06, radial velocity 18317 km/s
IC 4285 - 998 - Redshift 0,07, radial velocity 22241 km/s
IC 4282 - 619 - Redshift 0,04, radial velocity 13758 km/s
IC 4263 - 125
IC 4257 - 16 - Dwarfgalaxy
IC 4277 - 95

Sony A7III un-modified
UNC 200 f/4 Newton auf HEQ5 - guiding mit StarAid
stacked with mit DSS, processed: Siril and LightZone

M51 - June 9 2023 - Lights 42x180s ISO 800 - 14 Flats
1686905235176.jpeg


1686905278636.jpeg
Hickson 68 - June 12 2023 - 33x300s ISO 400 - 14 Flats
1686906592743.jpeg
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes davenn, collinsmark, DennisN and 3 others
  • #2,052
Messier 7 from my DSLR Camera. ESO Image for comparision. My image is a 'zoomed' extract from a much wider view between the tail of Scorpius and Alnasi in Sagittarius.

Messier 7c Rotated.jpg
Messier 7 from ESO.jpg


1686916735812.png
 
  • Like
Likes timmdeeg and DennisN
  • #2,053
Can't believe it's already time to image summer constellations! Here's M57 imaged @800/8 (nikon D810+ nikkor 400/2.8 + 2x tele) for 12.5 hours, 10s subs, stacking with AstroPixelProcessor:

M57-St-44670s copy.jpg


And a 200% zoom, IC1296 is also visible.

Untitled 2.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes pinball1970, davenn, collinsmark and 2 others
  • #2,054
Re Pixel Peeper video on GAS. Well it's just me and my Canon camera! Re previous image of Messier 7, here is the wider view between the tail of Scorpius and Alnasi in Sagittarius. Alnasi is peeping out from the leaves of the tree at centre right. A wispy M7 is at centre left a little lower.

Tail of Scorpius and Al Nasi.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, collinsmark and DennisN
  • #2,055
4th July 4:36am. Happy Independence Day to all my American colleagues.

Tail of Scorpius. M7 visible at upper right. Note binary star system at lower center next to the leaves. There's apparently another such at left but this pair are several light years apart so not a binary star system.

Tail of Scorpius 4th July 2023.jpg


Corresponding view in Stellarium Mu Scorpii in focus.

1688438836138.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes davenn, pinball1970, DennisN and 1 other person
  • #2,056
2023/07/14 / 01:28:51

Scorpius setting. The binary pair of Mu Scorpii is clearly distinct (if you zoom in) as is the closely spaced pair (non binary) comprising Zeta Scorpii. Pi Scorpii, Dschubba and Acrab form the crown of Scorpius and are all just above the leaves. Omega Scorpii is the pair of stars just above and to the left of Acrab. Antares is a "marker star" for Johannesburg since it passes directly overhead. Corresponding labelled view from Stellarium follows this pic.

Scorpius setting 14th July 2023 012851.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, davenn, collinsmark and 1 other person
  • #2,057
Labelled view of the same area of sky from Stellarium.

1689351396663.png
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes pinball1970, phinds, davenn and 1 other person
  • #2,058
I still haven't made up my mind about getting a star tracker and/or telescope for astrophotography, but yesterday I went into a second hand store and came out with this thing :smile: :

Telescope (1) (x800).png


If I understood correctly it's a Sky-Watcher Capricorn-70 EQ1, a refractor with focal length 900mm and a 70mm aperture (f/12.8), on a manual equatorial mount.

I frequently visit second hand stores but almost never see telescopes from well established manufacturers, so I thought it would be fun to try this out. I got it for merely $50 :smile:.

Also, I haven't used an equatorial mount before, so I think it will be good to get some experience with one.

Now I will clean it, and also clean the dusty optics of it, which I think will go smoothly since I've got some experience of servicing camera lenses :smile:.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn, collinsmark, vanhees71 and 1 other person
  • #2,060
Markarian's Chain together with M87. Markarian's Chain proper is in the upper left of the image, and M87 is in the lower center. They all can be seen, from Earth, in the constellation Virgo. Captured from my back patio.

Before I begin, let me state that acquisition and processing of this image was a mess. Some troubles were self induced, and some not. This project spanned from February though July of 2023.

There was about 2 months straight of cloudy skies at night. Straight. Every single night. What started as an early morning target ended up as an early evening target with nothing in between. Bounding that were weeks on either end of only a few minutes to a few hours of clear skies. And just to put things in perspective, I ended up with way more flat frames than light frames for this project.

Then, when processing the data, I came to realize that all the R, G, and B subframes were all slightly overexposed yielding saturation artifacts in the brighter stars. Ugggh. What have I done!?! Well, too late to collect more data this year. A redo will have to wait.

MarkarianChain2023_Final_SmallForPF.jpg

Figure 1. A bunch of dumb galaxies.

Below is a slightly cropped area showing just the Markarian's Chain region.

MarkChainOnly2023_SmallForPF.jpg

Figure 2. Markarian's Chain.

I think M87 turned out pretty interesting though. If you're not familiar with M87, do you remember a few years ago where the Event Horizon Telescope project released the first direct image of a black hole? That's the supermassive black hole at the center of M87.

It goes without saying that my little 80 mm refractor is not going to resolve the black hole. But surprisingly, it was able to resolve the relativistic jet spewing forth from M87's central, supermassive black hole. See Fig. 3. That jet coming from the center of the galaxy was actually captured with my wimpy little 80mm, backyard scope. The image is from the same data as the above image(s), only heavily cropped and contrast adjusted.

M87Only2023.jpg

Figure 3. M87.

The M87 jet is often used as an example of "superluminal motion," where if you were to naively calculate the speed of the jet [or particular parts of the jet] using simple, Newtonian physics, it would appear to be moving faster than the speed of light. Of course, it's not. It just naively "looks" that way because a) it is moving pretty darned fast in the first place, and b) a significant component of the jet's velocity vector is in our direction. It only ends up being measured as moving slower than light speed once you do your due diligence and take the physics of special relativity into account.

Equipment:
Explore Scientific 80ED-FCD100
Sky-Watcher EQ6-R Pro
Orion Field Flattener for Short Refractors (most data)
Orion 0.8x Focal Reducer for Refractors (some data)
Off-axis guider (OAG) with guide camera
Optolong L-Pro filter
Baader Hα 3.5nm Ultra-Narrowband filter
ZWO LRGB filter set
ZWO ASI2600MM-Pro main camera

On some rare, clear nights, it seemed my telescope sparked the curiosity of nearby passing clouds. They, of course, would call their cloud friends over to check out what all the hubub was about.

Software:
N.I.N.A.
PHD2 guiding
PixInsight with RC-Astro plugins

On one rare, clear night, there was even a helicopter with a searchlight circling overhead for some reason.

Integration:
Location: San Diego
Bortle class 7 (maybe 8 ) skies.
All subframes binned 1x1, stacked with drizzle algorithm
L-Pro: 320×120s = 10.67 hrs
Hα: 56×600s = 9.33 hrs
R: 142×180s = 7.10 hrs
G: 172×180s = 8.60 hrs
B: 183×180s = 9.15 hrs
Total integration time: 44.85 hours.
 
Last edited:
  • Love
  • Wow
Likes davenn, pinball1970 and DennisN
  • #2,061
collinsmark said:
But surprisingly, it was able to resolve the relativistic jet spewing forth from M87's central, supermassive black hole. See Fig. 3. That jet coming from the center of the galaxy was actually captured with my wimpy little 80mm, backyard scope.
Wow, that is so cool! :smile:

Edit:

On one rare, clear night, there was even a helicopter with a searchlight circling overhead for some reason.

Of course. The reason must have been to disturb your work. :biggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, davenn and collinsmark
  • #2,062
current state of a panormanic view of constellation Cygnus:

105mm_Cygnus-crop-lpc-cbg-crop-St copy 2.jpg


Original is about 8k x 8k pixels- roughly a 2 x 2 array of individual stacks taken with Nikon D810 + 105mm @ f/2 mounted on Losmandy GM-8, 30s subs. Images stacked and post-processed in APP. SNR and color are good, but the background is still too nonuniform. Hopefully a few more imaging sessions will be enough to smooth it all out.

Here's a few 1:1 crops of the Veil Nebula East (NGC 6992 and 6995); North America Nebula (NGC 7000) and Pelican Nebula (IC 5070) and a region centered on the Tulip Nebula (Sh2-101), which is located near Cygnus X-1.

Untitled.jpg


Untitled 2.jpg


Untitled 3.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes pinball1970, davenn, collinsmark and 1 other person
  • #2,063
Andy Resnick said:
Here's a few 1:1 crops of the Veil Nebula East (NGC 6992 and 6995); North America Nebula (NGC 7000) and Pelican Nebula (IC 5070) and a region centered on the Tulip Nebula (Sh2-101), which is located near Cygnus X-1.
Genesis 26:4 I will make your descendants as numerous as the stars in the sky.

In light of your pics, a big ask even for the Almighty :wink: !
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes pinball1970, davenn and DennisN
  • #2,064
The Pleiades and the Milky Way revisited

1. The Pleiades

In the autumn last year I tried shooting the Pleiades from a park inside the city (Bortle 8-9) just to see how it would go, and here's the result:

Pleiades - 1b (PS Output) (x800).png

The Pleiades

Pleiades - 1c (PS Output, crop) (x800).png

The Pleiades (crop): some of the blue reflection nebulae inside the cluster can be seen here, along with some magenta fringes around the stars left after post-processing.

Pleiades - 1d (PS Output, crop, with labels) (x800).png

The Pleiades (crop), with labels, matched with the help of Stellarium. When I looked at the image the three stars close to the star Alcyone (inside the green rectangle) caught my eye. I clicked on them in Stellarium but they had no designation. I checked with Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcyone_(star)#Companions) and maybe the three stars are these? :

Wikipedia said:
The Catalog of Components of Double and Multiple Stars lists three companions: B is 24 Tauri, a magnitude 6.28 A0 main-sequence star 117" away; C is V647 Tauri, a δ Sct variable star; and D is a magnitude 9.15 F3 main-sequence star. V647 Tau varies from magnitude +8.25 to +8.30 over 1.13 hours.

Pleiades (Stellarium).png

The Pleiades in Stellarium, with labels.

Info:

Date: 25 September 2022
Camera: Sony A6000
Lens: Tokina 200mm f/4.5 @ f/4.5
Camera settings: ISO 3200, 1.3s exposure
Light frames: 506 (506 * 1.3s = ca 11 minutes integration time)
Software used: Sequator, Photoshop2. The Milky Way

I've taken the time to learn how to use Siril too, and I like it.

@Devin-M : I've now tried stacking the shots of the Milky Way we talked about before in Siril, and my result was pretty poor. It could partly be due to my processing, but I think it is mainly due to the site I shot it at, i.e. the Milky Way brightness was low in comparison to the present light pollution. So maybe it is a waste of time to try to process these shots :smile:.

Milky Way, stacked with Siril:

Milky Way - Siril.png

I don't know why these "rainbow artifacts" appeared. Maybe I did something weird in the post-processing in Photoshop. :smile:

Milky Way, stacked with Deep Sky Stacker:

Milky Way - DSS 1d.png

I like that different colors in the Milky Way appeared in this image. I think I added quite a bit of saturation in the post-processing in Photoshop.

Detections by astrometry.net:

Milky Way - DSS 1d (Astrometry detections).png


(details for the Milky Way shoot is here)3. Telescope maintenance

My newly aquired Sky-Watcher Capricorn-70 EQ1 has been serviced, and all the optics have been cleaned with lens brush and then lens cleaner fluid and lens cloth. I was happy that it was very easy to disassemble and assemble it, much easier than a camera lens actually.

I took a look at Saturn some nights ago with the telescope, and it looked good. I'll probably try to take some shots with a camera attached to the telescope soon.

Sky-Watcher Capricorn-70 EQ1 disassembled:

1 (with labels).jpg


I took a look inside the tube and saw there are flanges/ridges/rims inside the tube (I don't know what these things are called), but according to my understanding these are there to cut off the extra unwanted light from e.g. internal reflections inside the tube.

And the inside of the tube looked good, painted in a very matte black color.

2 (inside the tube).jpg

Inside the Sky-Watcher Capricorn-70 tube.

The focusing mechanism:

3 (focusing mechanism).jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
  • Wow
Likes pinball1970, davenn, collinsmark and 1 other person
  • #2,065
DennisN said:
I took a look inside the tube and saw there are flanges/ridges/rims inside the tube (I don't know what these things are called), but according to my understanding these are there to cut off the extra unwanted light from e.g. internal reflections inside the tube.

If you're curious, they're called the baffle (or baffles). It's a weird word, because sometimes each of the ridges are individually called a baffle, and then collectively referred to as "baffles" (plural). But most of the time, all the ridges together are collectively called the "baffle" (singular).

It's also sometimes used as a verb or adjective describing the process of tapping more threads than technically necessary on the inside of tube rings and/or tube extensions/adapters, where it's called "baffling" or being "baffled."

You're right on the mark regarding its purpose. :smile:
 
  • Informative
  • Love
Likes pinball1970 and DennisN
  • #2,066
DennisN said:
I've taken the time to learn how to use Siril too, and I like it.

@Devin-M : I've now tried stacking the shots of the Milky Way we talked about before in Siril, and my result was pretty poor. It could partly be due to my processing, but I think it is mainly due to the site I shot it at, i.e. the Milky Way brightness was low in comparison to the present light pollution. So maybe it is a waste of time to try to process these shots :smile:.

Milky Way, stacked with Siril:

Milky Way - Siril.png

I don't know why these "rainbow artifacts" appeared. Maybe I did something weird in the post-processing in Photoshop. :smile:
Sorry it took so long, here's my version after processing your image through Siril and Adobe Lightroom:
result_150s-2-2_800w.jpg


Your original:
https://u.pcloud.link/publink/show?code=kZnDHNVZNMEUuHswPzpW36DuSpjLnhVPCgAy
DennisN said:
DN description (1).png

DennisN said:
DN description (4) - Milky Way.png


I'm far from satisfied with this photo, so I will try to process in other ways and in other software, probably Siril.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970 and DennisN
  • #2,068
Devin-M said:
Sorry it took so long, here's my version after processing your image through Siril and Adobe Lightroom:
No problem at all, I appreciate the effort! :smile:
I'm thinking of going to a better location (Bortle 3 or 4) for a Milky Way shoot later this summer or in the autumn.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes pinball1970 and collinsmark
  • #2,069
The Spindle Galaxy (a.k.a. M102, NGC 5866) coiled-up in my back patio from April through July 2023. The Spindle Galaxy is a lenticular galaxy (it might actually be a spiral) approximately 50 million light-years away, and can be seen from Earth in the constellation Draco.

Spindle2023_Final_SmallForPF.jpg


It's presumably called the "Spindle" Galaxy because nobody knows what a spindle is these days, and they had to call it something. Seriously though, a spindle is any sort of rod or cylinder who's purpose is to wrap stuff around it like thread, yarn, rope, wire, toilet paper, or pretty much anything that wraps around a rod or cylinder. M102 sort of looks like, at a glance, a rod with a bright ball of stuff wrapped around it. Or maybe it looks like a nearly empty roll of toilet paper: That cardboard thing at the center of a toilet paper roll together with the rod attached to the wall next to your toilet is technically a spindle mechanism. Either way, M102's similarity to a spindle is mostly a matter of perspective.

The most notable feature of M102 is its unmistakable dust lane. From Earth, we see it edge on, making it look like rod. But if it were possible for us to view this dust from another angle, it would certainly appear more circular, like a disk, ring, or spiral.

What's perhaps most interesting, is that this dust lane is slightly off axis -- tilted/warped a little bit -- compared to the galaxy's disk of starlight. Conceivably this might be explainable as the result of some sort of interaction with a nearby galaxy (M102 is the largest member of a small cluster of galaxies, the NGC 5866 Group). Whatever the case, I find it fascinating.

Equipment:
Meade 10" LX200-ACF fork mounted on an equatorial wedge.
Off-axis guider (OAG) with guide camera.
Optolong broadband filter set.
Optolong L-Pro filter
Optolong 3 nm Hα filter
ZWO ASI6200MM-Pro main camera.

This project took months due to some unusually cloudy weather in San Diego.

Software:
Nighttime Imaging 'N' Astronomy (N.I.N.A.)
PHD2 guiding
PixInsight with RC-Astro plugins

It may be a coincidence that I also find toilet paper spindles fascinating.

Integration:
San Diego, California
Bortle class 7 (maybe 8 ) skies
All subframes binned 3×3
R: 115×4 min = 7.67 hrs
G: 107×4 min = 7.13 hrs
B: 137×4 min = 9.13 hrs
L-Pro: 197×4 min = 13.13 hrs
Hα: 66×10 min = 11.00 hrs
Total integration time: 48.07 hours
 
Last edited:
  • Love
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes pinball1970, davenn and DennisN
  • #2,070
I've just started to watch this lecture from The Royal Institution, it seems good and also seems to have nice images and animations in it.
If you are a space fan, it might be worth checking it out. :smile:

Mapping the universe: dark energy, black holes, and gravity – with Chris Clarkson (Royal Institution, 25 April 2023)
"How can we map the universe and its galaxies? What's the evidence for dark matter and dark energy? And how has Einstein's general theory of relativity been proven by modern technology?"



Edit: And a Q&A is here too (which I will watch after I've seen the entire lecture).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K