Outdoor electronic soundproofing

  • Thread starter Thread starter AnnieH
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electronic
AI Thread Summary
Outdoor soundproofing using electronic or magnetic frequencies is largely impractical due to the fundamental differences between sound waves and electromagnetic waves. Effective soundproofing requires solid, heavy materials to absorb or reflect sound vibrations, which portable poles cannot provide. While techniques exist for reducing noise through phase cancellation, they are complex and costly, making them unsuitable for general outdoor use. Additionally, placing poles around an area could inadvertently reflect sound back, worsening noise levels. Advanced noise cancellation technology may be possible but would require significant expertise and investment.
AnnieH
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Excuse me. I am an accountant. No physics at all. But, is it possible to do outdoor soundproofing? I envisioned a setup of portable poles that could in effect soundproof an area with electonic or magnetic frequencies by blocking or effecting the sound waves coming from that area. Kind of like a cell phone or radio tower only small and portable to move with a truck or buy at Home Depot. They could be used in a small or large area, larger requiring more portable poles or taller poles. Cell phone signals can be blocked, why not sound waves? It would be a great invention for construction zones, highways, racetracks, or my teenage son's garage band. It could also make an outdoor area private like a private meeting room or a wedding. Does the military already have this technology? Is this even possible or have I been watching too much Star Trek? Seems like it could make a million $. Where are the aliens when you need them?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cell phone signals are elctromagnetic, they are blocked by a conducting (metal) screen.
Sound is a vibration of the air, the only way to stop it is to reflect or absorb the vibration - this requires something solid and heavy in the way.

There are techniques to reduce noise by broadcasting other sounds 'out of phase' with the original sound - which reduces the volume in a small area. It works well for enclose spaces and predictable low frequency noise - it's used in high end sports cars and turboprop aircraft.
 
As was previously mentioned, EM (electromagnetic) waves and sound waves (which are pressure waves) are ENTIRELY different things and although the aformentioned noise cancelling technology most certainly exists it is extraordinarily expensive and complicated. Unfortunatly the poor man's answer is no. You can't really do outdoor soundproofing without computer driven noise cancellation tech (although I feel like analog noise cancellation may exist but that's still not at all helpful). Furthermore, if you were to place posts around your outdoor property it would actually DECREASE sound proofing since they would serve to reflect the sound back inwards. However, let me just say, incase people try to correct me, that an advanced knowledge of physics and acoustic engineering could almost certainly concoct a device to block noise outdoors. However, it would neither be simply nor cheap
 
P.S. as you mentioned light waves can be blocked by "spamming" all frequencies near the broadcast frequency (radio, IR, UV, X-Rays, etc are all light). And similarily sound waves could be blocked by other sounds waves. However, the simplest way to do this (as it is done in radio jamming) would be like if you took your TV and turned it on to a channel you didn't get (i.e. where you get nothing but static) and turned it up so loud you can't hear what other people are saying. Which would not exactly be useful in REDUCING neighbours' annoyance outdoors. More advanced approaches to noise cancellation would require a complete control of the sound producing environment (like in a pair of headphones but not like the out of doors) and computer software/technology.
 
Thanks so much for all the information. It is very interesting.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top