Outer Lebesgue Measure Definition

  • Thread starter Thread starter atwood
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measure
atwood
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I've seen the definition that an outer Lebesgue measure is defined as
m_n^* (A) = \inf \left\{ \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} l(I_k) \, \left| \, A \subset \bigcup_{k=1}^{\infty} I_k \right}
where Ik are n-dimensional intervals and l(Ik) is the geometric length.

It is not actually clear to me if A has to be a proper subset. That is, does
A \subset \bigcup_{k=1}^{\infty} I_k
actually mean
A \subseteq \bigcup_{k=1}^{\infty} I_k
or
A \subsetneq \bigcup_{k=1}^{\infty} I_k
?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you think the distinction between those two cases is important? Show that the sum of l(I_k) can be made arbitrarily close to the sum of the lengths of intervals J_k where each I_k is a proper subset of J_k. That's a good exercise.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top