Overhead electrical transmission cable sag questions

AI Thread Summary
Normal catenary sag in overhead electrical transmission lines varies based on factors like distance between towers and voltage, with examples suggesting a sag of around 3 to 6 feet over a 100-foot span under different temperatures. Sag increases significantly in extreme heat, potentially doubling from 3 feet to 6 feet as temperatures rise from 32°F to 100°F. The heating of cables due to current does contribute to sag, but power companies prioritize minimizing voltage drop and power loss over sag concerns. The safety factor in designing these systems is not specified, but engineers utilize charts and computer programs for precise calculations, factoring in material properties and environmental conditions. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for effective design and operation of overhead transmission systems.
Calvadosser
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
These are questions for electrical engineers involved in electrical power transmission by overhead line and knowledgeable about current practices.

- What catenary sag is normal, under normal conditions of weather and transmitted current?
[obviously the answer will depend on the distance between towers and the voltage. What I want is specific examples. Perhaps as a percentage of the span between towers?]

- Does the sag increase significantly under conditions of extreme hot weather?
[A percentage increase would be helpful. Is it 1%? 10%? 50%?]

- Does the current carried heat the cables to produce significant additional sag?
[Again, a percentage increase would be helpful]

- Is it the additional sag due to heating that limits the current in overhead cables? Or is it, for example, the need to avoid excessive power loss.

- What is the safety factor normally used in designing overhead cable transmission systems?

Thank you for any information.
Martin
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
There are charts and even computer programs that figure this stuff out. There is definitely a formulated sheet available that would let you do it all by hand. It's definitely a challenge...but it will calculate for any temperature, wind load and also do a calculation for a half inch of ice around the cable. You will also need to use "curved" charts during your calcs...and you need to know every little detail about the cable you are using...that's the challenge.

The type of material used is of great importance (aluminum, copper, steel, etc...) The coefficient of elastic coefficiency is obviously a huge factor. "curlew" is a wire I onced used for a couple mile overhead line in a steel mill. Curlew is multiple stands of steel (strength) surrounded by mulitiple strands of aluminum (conductors)

http://wire.buyawg.com/item/all-categories/acsr-aluminum-conductor-steel-reinforced/curlew

The power company is more concerned with the heat in the wires for voltage drop or power loss, which affects their wallet...although a factor, they are less concerned with the sag due to heat generation in wire.

Anchoring these overhead lines at certain "pin points" into the ground will definitely test your statics and dynamics knowledge as well.
 
Last edited:
psparky - thank you. I never doubted that engineers designing cable systems have all necessary design tools at their disposal but having that confirmed does not really help me.

Could you please give some off-the-cuff ball-park figures, based on your experience, such as I asked for? I want to understand what happens in practice in general terms, so that I have a feel for the magnitudes of sag under different conditions of weather and electrical loading.

I had imagined that the need to minimize power loss would normally set the current limit, rather than heating. Does that always apply, or does temperature rise sometimes set a limit to current - especially in very hot weather?
 
Last edited:
I can give you some guesses based off my memory...it's been a while. I got paid for a couple months to figure out all this stuff and research it. My questions were similar to yours, thru the math I got there. And my boss had the computer program, he just wanted me to do it long hand because you simply learn more.

I don't recall figuring the heat of the wire from the amps...I don't even recall putting in the amount of amps. I believe this stuff is already figured into the multiple other questions they ask you. Doesn't mean it doesn't exist, i just don't recall to be honest.

I believe the wires sag way more in the summer...even when there is a half inch of ice on cable it does not sag as much as in summer. I believe over a 100 foot span, 5 feet of sag might be a reasonable guess. Keep in mind that the different line phases can not hit so it also depends on how close your wires are side by side as well as vertical.

I don't know what the safety factor is. Sorry I don't know all the answers, If you really want to know, you need to do the research yourself. Doing the actual calculations will be the greatest teacher of all.

Like they say, if you want something as bad as you want to breath, you will surely attain it.

But to maybe answer your question...if a 1" diameter line were hanging at 32 degrees F,with a 3 feet sag, with a 100 feet between poles, the new sag at 100 degrees F would be likely 6 feet.(depending greatly on the type of metal used) If I had the charts in front of me I could give you exact!
 
Last edited:
psparky said:
TThe power company is more concerned with the heat in the wires for voltage drop or power loss, which affects their wallet...although a factor, they are less concerned with the sag due to heat generation in wire.

And due to the high construction cost to guarantee sag won't be a problem, the trade-offs are considered. Hence sometimes they do make contact with Earth causing an outage.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top