Overlap as function of distance

  • Thread starter Thread starter ftft
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Overlap
ftft
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I am trying to find a way to calculate the overlap integral between atomic orbitals centred on two different atoms, A & B as a function of the separation distance. I hope someone in the forum can give a hint on how to do that.
Thanks,
ftft
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since orbitals are normally written in spherical polar coordinates, you'll have to convert them into Cartesian coordinates. I assume you know the equations for the spherical harmonics and the radial wavefunction. But the orbitals also get distorted by the presence of the other atom, so it becomes hard.
 
That's a good point Khashishi..
OK.. what if we generalize the problem to two molecules, A & B? each will then have molecular orbitals made by LCAO. To measure overlap in this case: Do we use the Slater wave function (which is determinant of LCAOs including occupied and empty orbitals) for each molecule? Or is it enough to compose the wave function from occupied orbitals? Mathematically, is it enough to calculate the inner product of the two (chosen) wave functions? I am assuming that only those parts of the two wave functions which see each other will contribute to the overlap integral.. how mathematically can we restrict the overlap a small part of the wave functions?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Back
Top