Pair production - which theory does it belong to

Click For Summary
Pair production is described within quantum field theory (QFT), which is a fundamental framework in particle physics. It involves scattering theory, a subdivision of QFT, and adheres to conservation laws and the relativistic energy-momentum relationship. For a deeper understanding, it's essential to grasp these principles mathematically rather than conceptually. Recommendations for books on pair production vary based on the desired depth of study. Understanding the equation E^2 = (pc)^2 + (mc^2)^2 is crucial for applying conservation laws in this context.
71GA
Messages
208
Reaction score
0
I am wondering in which theory pair productioon is described? Is it field theory, particle physics or quantum physics? I am sorry for such a basic question, but i need this info to find some books which will explain pair production mathematically and not by waving hands... (like allover the web)

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Quantum field theory
This is a field theory, it is a quantum theory, and (nearly?) all calculations in particle physics use quantum field theory.
 
Would you recommend any books for pair production?
 
71GA said:
Would you recommend any books for pair production?

It would depend on how deeply you want to get into it. Judging by the work you did and the questions you were asking in this thread, you'll get a long ways just by knowing two things:
1) Pair production obeys all the conservation laws.
2) The relativistic energy-momentum relationship: E^2 = (pc)^2 + (mc^2)^2
 
I am wondering in which theory pair productioon is described?
Actually this is so called scattering theory. This is indeed a subdivision of QFT.
 
Nugatory said:
It would depend on how deeply you want to get into it. Judging by the work you did and the questions you were asking in this thread, you'll get a long ways just by knowing two things:
1) Pair production obeys all the conservation laws.
2) The relativistic energy-momentum relationship: E^2 = (pc)^2 + (mc^2)^2

Could you write down in my other topic, how i could use this equation? To achieve same ##h \nu## which i get by conservation of energy and conservation of momentum.
 
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
969
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K