News Palin pick an insult to our intelligence

  • Thread starter Thread starter physucsc11
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Intelligence
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the impact of Sarah Palin's selection as the vice-presidential candidate for John McCain's campaign. Initial reactions highlighted her appeal to women, but the conversation quickly shifted to criticisms of her qualifications and the controversies surrounding her, such as her daughter's pregnancy and various ethical issues. Despite these controversies, many supporters remained loyal, attributing her popularity to her charisma and ability to connect with conservative values. Critics argue that her lack of substantial experience and knowledge in complex political matters undermines her candidacy. The dialogue also touches on the broader implications of the election process, suggesting that it has devolved into a popularity contest rather than a serious evaluation of candidates' qualifications and policies. Participants express frustration over the perceived ignorance of voters who support candidates based on superficial traits rather than substantive issues, leading to concerns about the future of democracy and informed decision-making in elections.
  • #101
If you can't follow the logic, then you are probably a Democrat.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #102
BobG said:
I think she's telling the truth that that comment was somewhat borrowed from Lincoln's famous quote.

Come on. Lincoln's quote was said within the context of a Civil War. His was a mission that required that if victorious the South would need reassimilation. To claim that the North's cause was more just would have been hubris, especially within that context, and my reading of Lincoln suggests to me that he was generally pragmatic about the war and its prosecution, and its ultimate conclusion.

Palin's comment looks like thoughtless hubris insofar as I am fairly certain that she actually believes that God is on her side in some way against the interest of others that do not believe in the Pentecostal vision. Her God apparently plays favorites, and she would count herself among them and the Muslims not. She sounds to me like she thinks the war in Iraq is a just war - even though we came to the battle through cynical deception and misrepresentation by the current administration.

Frankly I think that reveals an egocentric perspective on her part without any glimmer of recognition that Muslims may have a valid point about US involvement in their affairs. And that as misguided as Osama Bin Laden may have been in his tactics, no matter how cowardly his method, we have behaved badly with our policies there.
 
  • #103
Twisting of words was hardly necessary: I'm more alarmed by the picture of electorate/executive interaction implicit in Palin's comments than any of the stuff about God or Lincoln. "Pray that there is a plan?" No, in a democracy, we have much more direct ways of ensuring that war planning gets done properly. For example, we can decline to vote for people that leave any doubt as to whether they will plan ahead before going to war. We can also directly demand to know what the plan is, who made it, and why it wasn't done differently. And we can pressure Congress to refuse to go along with said plans if we don't like them. When you get to the point of having to pray that a plan even exists in the first place, you're in serious trouble.
 
  • #104
jimmysnyder said:
If you can't follow the logic, then you are probably a Democrat.
I am an independent and am far more fiscally conservative and far more protective of individual rights and far more conservative with regard to foreign affairs than the Republicans currently in power. If you want to use insults (stupid=Democrat) to further your discourse, you picked the wrong guy. Show me where in the video that I linked that Sarah Palin did NOT claim to know God's will.

The world is not black-and-white Jimmy, and though many Republican and Democratic candidates have enjoyed my support in the past, the current crop of neo-con-serving Republicans currently controlling our foreign affairs and economic policy deserve to be swept out of power. If you can't follow that logic...
 
  • #105
quadraphonics said:
Twisting of words was hardly necessary: I'm more alarmed by the picture of electorate/executive interaction implicit in Palin's comments than any of the stuff about God or Lincoln. "Pray that there is a plan?" No, in a democracy, we have much more direct ways of ensuring that war planning gets done properly. For example, we can decline to vote for people that leave any doubt as to whether they will plan ahead before going to war. We can also directly demand to know what the plan is, who made it, and why it wasn't done differently. And we can pressure Congress to refuse to go along with said plans if we don't like them. When you get to the point of having to pray that a plan even exists in the first place, you're in serious trouble.

When you get to the point of having to pray that there actually is a Bush Doctrine? :smile: Have you been out of the country for several years? Congress stand up to Bush? Even with public opinion polls showing that most of the country opposed invading Iraq without UN approval, Congress folded - Democrats included. They gave him a blank check while mumbling about how they hoped he didn't abuse it.

Edit: Completely irrelevant to the argument about Palin's comment, by the way, but I couldn't help myself.
 
  • #106
turbo-1 said:
Watch the video. She says that our national leaders are sending our troops to fight in Iraq and that it is God's plan. She can't deny she said that, and unless she was lying, she presumes to know what God intends.

Palins ACTUAL words from the video.

…Pray for our military. He’s going to be deployed in September to Iraq. Pray for our military men and women who are striving to do what is right also for this country. That our leaders, our national leaders are sending them out on a task that is from God. That’s what we have to make sure that we’re praying for…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2ypVSYoEKA&NR=1
 
  • #107
"... our national leaders are sending them out on a task that is from God" Combined with her assertions that God wants a natural gas pipeline built, it seems that she and God are pretty tight. I should ask her if God wants me to win the Powerball lottery.
 
  • #108
Palin said:
But what Abraham Lincoln had said, and that's a repeat in my comments, was let us NOT pray that God is on our side in a war or any other time, but let us pray that we are on God's side.
U2's Bono used almost exactly the same phrasing in describing his aid to Africa work. Clearly he's another right wing nut job channelling God.

Edit:
U2 said:
I believe in the kingdom come
Then all the colors will bleed into one
Bleed into one
Well yes I'm still running

You broke the bonds and you
Loosed the chains
Carried the cross
Of my shame
Of my shame
You know I believed it
Yep, no question, nut job, lock him up.
 
Last edited:
  • #109
turbo-1 said:
"... our national leaders are sending them out on a task that is from God" Combined with her assertions that God wants a natural gas pipeline built, it seems that she and God are pretty tight. I should ask her if God wants me to win the Powerball lottery.

So why did you parse the quote like that?

Definition:
Yellow Journalism - Journalism that exploits, distorts, or exaggerates the news to create sensations and attract readers.
 
  • #110
jimmysnyder said:
Gibson twisted her words to the breaking point.
Compare that, and his tone, to his Obama interview:
http://abcnews.go.com/WN/Story?id=4404210&page=4
...Senator, you're kind to take the time, on a day when you legitimately should be able to simply just take long naps. I thank you. All the best to you.
Better than the SNL can I get you a pillow skit.
 
  • #111
BobG said:
When you get to the point of having to pray that there actually is a Bush Doctrine? :smile: Have you been out of the country for several years? Congress stand up to Bush? Even with public opinion polls showing that most of the country opposed invading Iraq without UN approval, Congress folded - Democrats included. They gave him a blank check while mumbling about how they hoped he didn't abuse it.

But Obama has voted against the war much to his credit.

And he is after all the candidate that represents change in a good way, and not in a retarded way.
 
  • #112
turbo-1 said:
I am an independent.
Please accept my sincere apologies turbo-1. That post was not directed at you. I'm sorry you took it that way and I blame myself for it.
 
  • #113
I have to admit the church's pastor, Pastor Kalnin, is every bit as bizarre as Rev Wright ever was, seeming to believe the end times are coming and that Alaska will be filled with hundreds of thousands of refugees from the lower 48 - something even Palin isn't totally oblivious to:
As I travel around the state, it's really cool to visit other communities and visit other churches and, once in a while, a pastor will come up to me before the service starts and say, "Now, I don't know about your background, but, you know, you're welcome here at our worship service and, now, don't be surprised if maybe a parishioner or two want to raise their hands and clap", and I say, "I grew up at Wassilla Assembly of God! Nothing freaks me out about a worship service!"
 
  • #114
turbo-1 said:
Show me where in the video that I linked that Sarah Palin did NOT claim to know God's will.
This is non-sequitur. Gibson twisted her words. I quoted her, I quoted him. His words twist hers. I don't care how many times since the big bang Gibson did not twist Palin's words. I quoted the one time that he did.
 
  • #115
jimmysnyder said:
This is non-sequitur. Gibson twisted her words. I quoted her, I quoted him. His words twist hers. I don't care how many times since the big bang Gibson did not twist Palin's words. I quoted the one time that he did.
Here is the clip again.



Watch the clip, and pay attention. When you manage to get to a point at which you can dispute the point that Palin claims to know the will of God in regard to the Iraq war or the natural gas pipeline, please provide citations. You can't. Gibson did not twist her words - he gave her a chance to clarify her words and she blew it with some contrived scripted reference to Lincoln. Lame.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #116
turbo-1 said:
Show me where in the video that I linked that Sarah Palin did NOT claim to know God's will.
How about at about 7:55 into the video:
Because I didn't know if I was going to make it here tonight ... I flew in from Juneau last night and fly back to Juneau again, tomorrow ... so I didn't prepare anything thinking that our schedule wouldn't allow me to be here.
If she knew God's will, she would have prepared something and probably would have delivered the part she stole from Lincoln a little better.
 
  • #117
turbo-1 said:
Here is the clip again.



Watch the clip, and pay attention. When you manage to get to a point at which you can dispute the point that Palin claims to know the will of God in regard to the Iraq war or the natural gas pipeline, please provide citations. You can't. Gibson did not twist her words - he gave her a chance to clarify her words and she blew it with some contrived scripted reference to Lincoln. Lame.

I watched the clip and payed attention. At roughly 53 seconds into the clip she says this:
Sarah Palin said:
That’s what we have to make sure that we’re praying for, that there is a plan and that that plan is God’s plan.
This is how Gibson twisted it:
Gibson said:
I take your point about Lincoln’s words, but you went on and said, “There is a plan and it is God’s plan.
Note, that while Palin did indeed say pretty much as Gibson says, the part that he leaves out makes a crucial difference in the meaning. The reason that it is crucial is that if you leave it in, it does echo Lincoln's words, but if you leave it out then it does not.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #118
BobG said:
How about at about 7:55 into the video:

If she knew God's will, she would have prepared something and probably would have delivered the part she stole from Lincoln a little better.
She didn't steal anything from Lincoln, IMO. Her tenuous grasp of history, foreign affairs, etc makes that highly unlikely. She spoke off-the-cuff and McCain's staff tried to give her that fig leaf to cover her evangelist faith, and it failed. Now, you can disagree if you like, but then you'll have to explain how Palin knew that God wanted a natural-gas pipeline built, in the same speech. Did Lincoln claim that God wanted a natural-gas pipeline?

Palin-apologists are stretching the truth thinner than a gnat's butt across a rain-barrel. She is on record with a number of public pronouncements, and they cannot be waved away with faith and bluster.
 
  • #119
jimmysnyder said:
Note, that while Palin did indeed say pretty much as Gibson says, the part that he leaves out makes a crucial difference in the meaning.

Indeed; not only is she not claiming to know God's plan, she is also claiming not to know if Bush even had a plan for the war in the first place. And, to boot, suggeting that the appropriate response to said ignorance is prayer and not, you know, actual engagement with policy. What's she going to do if she becomes president and there's a crisis? Pray that her cabinet has a plan?
 
  • #120
quadraphonics said:
What's she going to do if she becomes president and there's a crisis? Pray that her cabinet has a plan?

Undoubtedly she will have Rove and Cheney around as valued advisers to help her bridge her faith with government policies.
 
  • #121
turbo-1 said:
She didn't steal anything from Lincoln, IMO. Her tenuous grasp of history, foreign affairs, etc makes that highly unlikely. She spoke off-the-cuff and McCain's staff tried to give her that fig leaf to cover her evangelist faith, and it failed. Now, you can disagree if you like, but then you'll have to explain how Palin knew that God wanted a natural-gas pipeline built, in the same speech. Did Lincoln claim that God wanted a natural-gas pipeline?

Palin-apologists are stretching the truth thinner than a gnat's butt across a rain-barrel. She is on record with a number of public pronouncements, and they cannot be waved away with faith and bluster.
Speaking for myself, I never apologized for Palin. I only said that Gibson twisted her words. I think Gibson is too big to apologize.
 
  • #122
BobG said:
I have to admit the church's pastor, Pastor Kalnin, is every bit as bizarre as Rev Wright ever was, seeming to believe the end times are coming and that Alaska will be filled with hundreds of thousands of refugees from the lower 48 - something even Palin isn't totally oblivious to:
As I travel around the state, it's really cool to visit other communities and visit other churches and, once in a while, a pastor will come up to me before the service starts and say, "Now, I don't know about your background, but, you know, you're welcome here at our worship service and, now, don't be surprised if maybe a parishioner or two want to raise their hands and clap", and I say, "I grew up at Wassilla Assembly of God! Nothing freaks me out about a worship service!"

Actually, Palin isn't even a member of that church. (It was the church she was raised in, however).
 
  • #123
Usually I try to stay clear of discussing politics on the internet, but I have to ask this: after watching Sarah Palin's interview with Charlie Gibson, surely no intelligent human being would vote for McCain, right?
 
  • #124
turbo-1 said:
She didn't steal anything from Lincoln, IMO. Her tenuous grasp of history, foreign affairs, etc makes that highly unlikely. She spoke off-the-cuff and McCain's staff tried to give her that fig leaf to cover her evangelist faith, and it failed. Now, you can disagree if you like, but then you'll have to explain how Palin knew that God wanted a natural-gas pipeline built, in the same speech. Did Lincoln claim that God wanted a natural-gas pipeline?

I think that the first bit about the war and "god's plan" is not exactly saying that it was god's plan. Its arguable. The bit where she describes the pipeline as "god's will" though is fairly undisputable. And I hardly see a quote from Lincoln in any of it either.
Is it somehow a famous quote that most people know? Don't people usually preface such quotes with "[so and so] once said..." or something similar? Pretty lame cover up.
 
  • #125
TheStatutoryApe said:
I think that the first bit about the war and "god's plan" is not exactly saying that it was god's plan. Its arguable. The bit where she describes the pipeline as "god's will" though is fairly undisputable. And I hardly see a quote from Lincoln in any of it either.
Is it somehow a famous quote that most people know? Don't people usually preface such quotes with "[so and so] once said..." or something similar? Pretty lame cover up.

Most people know of the quote and can look it up when they need it. A few people could probably remember the quote word for word either because they're really good at memorizing quotes or really liked that particular quote for some reason.
 
  • #126
LowlyPion said:
There is nothing to look up.
Look this up:
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/sliming_palin.html"
I'm not surprised that random people buy into this lie, but I am surprised that Gibson would bring it up in the interview without doing his homework.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #127
I'm encouraged that McCain picked Palin. Surely nothing could make it more clear that this ticket is offering more of the same policies of the last 8 years, or worse. If that is a winning combination I will be amazed. And some people in my close circle have said they will be ready to also give up on America as hopeless, and move to Europe. I admit I too will be extremely discouraged if the lunatic right wing, which is clearly the primary constituency for McCain - Palin, wins again.

I have often been wrong before, but surely the republicans cannot again cry out about war and abortion and terrorism, guns and other hot buttons for two months this Fall, and then proceed to rob the taxpayer blind again for 4-8 more years, pouring it all into the coffers of big business. I mean, how dumb can the electorate be?.

I am confident there are more voters opposed to than in favor of these policies, but it seems they do not vote as reliably as the nutcase right wing. Perhaps more of us need to volunteer to drive old and poor people to the polls. And STUDENTS need to get involved.
 
  • #128
http://abcnews.go.com/wn - Palin on Domestic policy.
When asked what she would change from the Bush administration's economic policies, she talks about non-interventionist policies in between ennumerating some of the advantages of a stable economy :rolleyes:. Then, when pressed that this is no different from Bush's economic policies, she says cut taxes, control spending [which is another way of saying non-interventionist], reform companies like Freddie and Fannie.

jimmysnyder: in the UK the supreme legislative body is the Parliament. Power essentially lies with the (elected) house of commons. A cabinet formed by the Prime Minister (invariably but not technically the leader of the political party holding the majority of seats in the Commons) is the key decision making body in the executive. It's their job to sell government policy to the rest of the house, who vote for or against motions put before them. The (appointed) house of Lords is mainly conmprised of experts in various fields (like Robert Winston) appointed to peerages (say "Lord") who can effectively force Commons a finite number of times to re-think any bills they don't like that have been approved by the Commons before they become law.



The gas pipeline quote (2.05)
The Iraq war as a task that is from God (3.40)
From this I think it's pretty clear that 1)she thinks God's will entails people coming together to build the pipeline 2)she isn't explicitly saying that the iraq war is God's will, but she's encouraging people to pray that they are doing the right thing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #129
jimmysnyder said:
Look this up:
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/sliming_palin.html"
I'm not surprised that random people buy into this lie, but I am surprised that Gibson would bring it up in the interview without doing his homework.

Perhaps you can help me out in understanding why a Town Librarian would be requested to resign as a Loyalty issue to the mayor of a city. Just what Loyalty does a Mayor even have a right to demand? Palin was elected as Mayor not Queen. I can't recall such a situation at a town level for a Librarian. Perhaps at the White House, in certain circumstances, but I certainly can't remember such "courtesy resignations" required of the Librarian of Congress for instance. (There have only been 13 Librarians of Congress since 1802.) I'd have to say that the idea seems a little bizarre to expect that a Town Librarian would need to resign for such a petty purpose.

In that regard it raises the issue of just why Palin would have asked such "rhetorical" questions. Why a "Loyalty Test"? Why would a Town Librarian for instance ever have to be faced with a situation of removing books from the shelves at the request of the Mayor? By what right would a Mayor ever think to interfere with what is on the shelves of the Library? That strikes me as a trifle presumptuous and more than a bit imperial in thinking to affect policy for which she would by right have no standing under Law to affect.

Has the world not yet learned the lessons of the "Action against the Un-German Spirit"?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #130
She didn't ask just the librarian to quit. She fired about a half dozen town officials as a loyalty test, as soon as she was elected Mayor.

http://www.mceades.com/graphics/palin_article1.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #131
LowlyPion said:
Perhaps you can help me out in understanding why a Town Librarian would be requested to resign as a Loyalty issue to the mayor of a city.
I believe the librarian position was a patronage job and that the librarian was hired by, and in the previous election had supported the previous mayor. I don't have links for any of this.
 
  • #132
jimmysnyder said:
I believe the librarian position was a patronage job and that the librarian was hired by, and in the previous election had supported the previous mayor. I don't have links for any of this.
I think that's mostly right.

But are chief of police, public works director and finance director also patronage positions?
 
  • #133
jimmysnyder said:
I believe the librarian position was a patronage job and that the librarian was hired by, and in the previous election had supported the previous mayor. I don't have links for any of this.
Gokul43201 said:
She didn't ask just the librarian to quit. She fired about a half dozen town officials as a loyalty test, as soon as she was elected Mayor.

http://www.mceades.com/graphics/palin_article1.jpg

While it may be true that the Police Chief and the Museum Director of Wasilla are appointed by the Mayor and serve specifically at the Mayor's pleasure, the City Librarian does not by statute apparently fall into that category of appointees owing "Loyalty" to the Mayor, whose position might be more commonly thought of as a patronage position.
http://www.codepublishing.com/ak/wasilla.html

But beyond the issue of the Mayor's authority to have acted to demand resignation, one has to question how such rhetorical questions can be asked about taking books off the shelf of a Public Library in the first place.

Perhaps someone can explain why a Mayor would ask such a question? What would she be thinking that such a situation could ever arise to be asking in the first place ... unless of course she was considering that she might actually ask to have books removed?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #134
Evo said:
Intelligent and detailed? Please quote those here, I'm serious. I've read the transcript and apparently missed them.

And the, the Iraq, the South Africa, they don't have maps. :smile:

Transcript

http://blogs.abcnews.com/theworldnewser/2008/09/the-palin-inter.html
Have you seen the Obama stammer sessions? Look for the open questions, not prepared remarks. Transcripts won't do as the service nicely cleans up double 'the's and non verbal, at least for Obama.
 
  • #135
jimmysnyder said:
Look this up:
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/sliming_palin.html"
I'm not surprised that random people buy into this lie, but I am surprised that Gibson would bring it up in the interview without doing his homework.
Note that almost all of those false or misleading stories were repeated on this forum.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #136
mheslep said:
Have you seen the Obama stammer sessions? Look for the open questions, not prepared remarks. Transcripts won't do as the service nicely cleans up double 'the's and non verbal, at least for Obama.

Yes, I've seen those. But there aren't many of them, and those open untranscripted remarks come on the primary trail after how many public performances. The Right Wing Nuts have poured over how many hours to take those few moments out of context to twist to their propaganda misrepresentations?

Given Palin's time to prepare and rest and be the best that she can be for Gibson - and that's all she's got? "I can see Russia, so I know what's going on in Georgia"?

Please. She is little more than a golf cart trying to pretend she can qualify for the Indianapolis 500.
 
  • #137
Here's a better choice for McCain's VP.

Mary Bono Mack - http://bono.house.gov/Issues/ -
http://bono.house.gov/Biography/ - loads of experience! Real experience. No embellishment needed.


On the other hand - Palin seems to be McCain's feeble attempt at affirmative action, which I thought the GOP opposed. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #138
An affront to women... When Palin was mayor of Wasilla, rape victims were required to pay for "rape kits" and processing. It was the only town in Alaska that placed the cost of forensic testing on the victims of sexual assault. The state legislature passed a law banning the practice, which was signed into law by the former governor of Alaska, Tony Knowles. It's not surprising that a pentecostal mayor believes that no abortions should be allowed, even in the case of rape. It is surprising that she felt that rape victims should have to pay for medical testing.

http://news.bostonherald.com/news/2008/view.bg?articleid=1118416&srvc=2008campaign&position=9
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #139
turbo-1 said:
An affront to women... When Palin was mayor of Wasilla, rape victims were required to pay for "rape kits" and processing. It was the only town in Alaska that placed the cost of forensic testing on the victims of sexual assault. The state legislature passed a law banning the practice, which was signed into law by the former governor of Alaska, Tony Knowles. It's not surprising that a pentecostal mayor believes that no abortions should be allowed, even in the case of rape. It is surprising that she felt that rape victims should have to pay for medical testing.

http://news.bostonherald.com/news/2008/view.bg?articleid=1118416&srvc=2008campaign&position=9
Incidentally, the Federal Law that provides victims with rape kits has its origins in one Sen. Joseph Biden.
wiki said:
The Violence Against Women Act of 1994 (VAWA) is a United States federal law. It was passed as Title IV, sec. 40001-40703 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 HR 3355 and signed as Public Law 103-322 by President Bill Clinton on September 13, 1994. It provided $1.6 billion to enhance investigation and prosecution of the violent crime perpetrated against women, increased pre-trial detention of the accused, provided for automatic and mandatory restitution of those convicted, and allowed civil redress in cases prosecutors chose to leave unprosecuted.

VAWA was drafted by Senator Joseph Biden's office with support from a number of advocacy organizations including Legal Momentum and The National Organization for Women, which heralded the bill as "the greatest breakthrough in civil rights for women in nearly two decades."

VAWA was reauthorized by Congress in 2000, and again in December 2005. The bill was signed into law by President George W. Bush on January 5, 2006. [1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violence_Against_Women_Act

And http://www.hollywood-newsroom.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/sarah-palin-busty.jpg , has the gall to call herself a feminist!?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #140
Astronuc said:
Here's a better choice for McCain's VP.

Mary Bono Mack - http://bono.house.gov/Issues/ -
http://bono.house.gov/Biography/ - loads of experience! Real experience. No embellishment needed.


On the other hand - Palin seems to be McCain's feeble attempt at affirmative action, which I thought the GOP opposed. :rolleyes:

Yeah, but McCain-Bono-Mack is actually a stranger ticket name than Obama-Biden.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #141
turbo-1 said:
An affront to women...

Looks like she is an affront to reformers too.

Boston Herald said:
Knowles and Weinstein also went after the Republican ticket on several statements now airing in campaign ads around the nation, including Palin’s claim that she opposed federal money for the "bridge to nowhere."

The governor has refused to acknowledge her explicit support for the $230 million Gravina Island Access Project in her effort to sound more like an anti-earmark reformer to a national audience, Weinstein said.

And she still supports spending $400 million to $600 million on "the other Bridge to Nowhere," the Knik Arm Crossing, which would provide residents in Palin’s hometown of Wasilla faster access to Anchorage, Knowles added.

"That project is moving right ahead," said Knowles, who served as governor of Alaska from 1994 to 2002. "The money for that project was not diverted anywhere else. ... So (for her) to say she said, ’Thanks, but no thanks...’ I would say she said, ’Thanks!’"
 
  • #142
Gokul43201 said:
Incidentally, the Federal Law that provides victims with rape kits has its origins in one Sen. Joseph Biden.
Thanks! I did not know that, but following up:

The Senate version of the legislation that included the rape-exam provision was sponsored by Sen. Joe Biden of Delaware, the Democratic vice presidential nominee. Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama was one of 58 co-sponsors; Republican presidential nominee John McCain was not
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-09-10-rape-exams_N.htm
 
  • #143
Here's a map of the Knik Arm Crossing.

http://www.knikarmbridge.com/documents/RegionalConnection.PDF

It's not funded as yet apparently it's still in the planning stage.

To be fair, while it does make things a little closer for Wasilla it also looks like it shortens Anchorage to Fairbanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #144
In following up on "rape kit" in Google, I found quite a number of pages offering advice to rape victims, and one thing that stood out was the frequent reference to "emergency contraception", including high-dose contraceptive pills, high doses of estrogen, etc, to prevent implantation of any eggs that may have been fertilized in the rape. I don't know if Alaska's "rape kits" included emergency contraception - any help here?

Could this have been a reason for Palin to try to restrict victim's access to such care? When he was interviewed recently, the police chief that she fired was unaware that victims were later made to pay for the kits, so the policy seems to have been put in place by his replacement. BTW, if you google a bit, you will see that the rate of rapes per capita in Alaska is double the national average, and it's far worse in rural and small-town Alaska than in its cities.
 
  • #145
turbo-1 said:
In following up on "rape kit" in Google, I found quite a number of pages offering advice to rape victims, and one thing that stood out was the frequent reference to "emergency contraception", including high-dose contraceptive pills, high doses of estrogen, etc, to prevent implantation of any eggs that may have been fertilized in the rape. I don't know if Alaska's "rape kits" included emergency contraception - any help here?

Could this have been a reason for Palin to try to restrict victim's access to such care? When he was interviewed recently, the police chief that she fired was unaware that victims were later made to pay for the kits, so the policy seems to have been put in place by his replacement. BTW, if you google a bit, you will see that the rate of rapes per capita in Alaska is double the national average, and it's far worse in rural and small-town Alaska than in its cities.

Here is an interesting discussion of EC at the ACLU. I think there is no question that the Wasilla requirement for a rape victim to be further penalized after the indignity of assault to in essence prove that she was assaulted is driven by ignorant ideology that serves no ones needs but those of the smug Right Wing that would attempt to penalize the innocent to impose their beliefs on others. I think Sarah Palin should be ashamed of such meanness.
http://www.aclu.org/reproductiverights/contraception/16425res20070213.html

Apparently the Bush administration dropped from its recommendation for rape kit procedures any mention of emergency contraception, despite the national medical societies' positions that it is crucial to offer and provide it as soon as possible.
http://www.billingsgazette.com/newdex.php?display=rednews/2004/12/31/build/nation/80-rape-victims.inc
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #146
Thanks, LP. Good catches.
 
  • #147
Evidence that Sarah Palin is unworthy of public office. She is personally vindictive, uses a personal patronage system, and attempts to circumvent the rules and laws of public office - a perfect fit for the Bush/Cheney regime. This woman is corrupt.

Once Elected, Palin Hired Friends and Lashed Foes
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/14/us/politics/14palin.html

WASILLA, Alaska — Gov. Sarah Palin lives by the maxim that all politics is local, not to mention personal.

So when there was a vacancy at the top of the State Division of Agriculture, she appointed a high school classmate, Franci Havemeister, to the $95,000-a-year directorship. A former real estate agent, Ms. Havemeister cited her childhood love of cows as a qualification for running the roughly $2 million agency.

Ms. Havemeister was one of at least five schoolmates Ms. Palin hired, often at salaries far exceeding their private sector wages.

. . . .

Using private email accounts for state ('public') business!? Ostensibly to cover illegal activities.

Talk about RICO - Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization. The FBI needs to investigate!
 
Last edited:
  • #148
turbo-1 said:
An affront to women... When Palin was mayor of Wasilla, rape victims were required to pay for "rape kits" and processing. It was the only town in Alaska that placed the cost of forensic testing on the victims of sexual assault. The state legislature passed a law banning the practice, which was signed into law by the former governor of Alaska, Tony Knowles. It's not surprising that a pentecostal mayor believes that no abortions should be allowed, even in the case of rape. It is surprising that she felt that rape victims should have to pay for medical testing.

http://news.bostonherald.com/news/2008/view.bg?articleid=1118416&srvc=2008campaign&position=9

Mostly true. Technically, this was the police chief's policy, but Palin appointed him and should have known about this (if she didn't - she might have known about it and might have supported the policy).

The emergency contraceptive part of the rape kits shouldn't have been a problem, though, since her stance has been pro-contraceptives even if believing abortions should only be allowed when the mother's life was endangered.
Achorage Daily News said:
Palin said last month that no woman should have to choose between her career, education and her child. She is pro-contraception and said she's a member of a pro-woman but anti-abortion group called Feminists for Life. "I believe in the strength and the power of women, and the potential of every human life," she said.

By the way, Joe Biden is pro-life and has the same stance as Palin regarding public/federal funds for abortion and partial birth abortions. NARAL rates Biden at 36% as a pro-choice candidate (with Obama being 100%). NARAL has never rated Palin. What has each done to promote pro-life positions?

Palin: Signed a 'Safe Haven' bill allowing a parent to surrender a newborn without threat of prosecution (provided no child abuse has occurred). She's against public funds being used to support abortion although she's never had the issue come before her. (Palin on abortion)

Biden: Voted to ban partial birth abortions and has consistently supported no federal funding for abortions. (Biden on abortion).

Obama: Just for the heck of it. (Obama on abortion).

By the way, is she Pentacostal? Was she Pentacostal? Was she Catholic? Is Obama's former church Pentacostal? (A different current thread refers to Obama's former church as Pentacostal, when it's not).

I'm not quite sure why the criticism of Palin has gone down the side path of her religious beliefs. At least this one could be a real instance where she imposed her personal beliefs into her own policies as a public official. So far, it's the only instance that comes close.

Edit: Crime statistics for Wasilla (including rape). Unfortunately, the statistics don't include most of the years that Palin was mayor, but you could calculate the average. Wasilla is located about 43 miles outside of Anchorage and about a third of the Wasilla population commute to Anchorage for work each day (it's somewhat rural, somewhat suburb).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #149
BobG said:
I'm not quite sure why the criticism of Palin has gone down the side path of her religious beliefs. At least this one could be a real instance where she imposed her personal beliefs into her own policies as a public official. So far, it's the only instance that comes close.

Unfortunately she has demonstrated herself to be a vindictive right wing extremist in her beliefs, who by her actions has let her religion interfere with the performance of her duties, against the best interest of all citizens. Denying contraception to rape victims, maybe not by commission, but through omission, demonstrates a lack of sensitivity to the situations that those victims already face. It also reflects a moral choice that she would readily impose on others, without offering them choice through informed consent.

Your suggestion that she is "pro-contraception" looks like you are the one that has been snowed. Because I can assure you that the strict pro-life interpretation - at conception - rules out taking such a morning after pill as they would treat it as abortion, if the ovum is by chance already fertilized.

Her vindictiveness occurs in several instances. The librarian for whom she had no right to even ask what she would do if requested to remove books from the shelves, or the demand for a loyalty test resignation that is not supported by town statute. Then there is the ex-brother in law that she stuck her nose into the middle of the divorce from her sister, to have fired. There is no other way to describe that than as an act of vindictiveness. An act unwarranted in the performance of her duty in office. And when the guy wasn't fired at her direction, she fired the guy that wouldn't break the law on her account? Vindictive.

Then there is the anti-gay partnership stance. Another case of choosing religious belief over compassion for everyone's rights to be treated equally under the law.

Then again there is her support of Intelligent design - choosing religion over science?

And you would wonder why there would be concerns about her religion when she has yet to demonstrate much separation in her own life between Church and State? Her brand of religion - imposing that religion on others is anathema to the fundamental principles of the Constitution.
 
  • #150
This woman is corrupt.
Do you have proof of this?
Using private email accounts for state ('public') business!? Ostensibly to cover illegal activities.
Do you have proof of these illegal activities?


And to think she has an 80% approval rating.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
71
Views
10K
Replies
22
Views
8K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
129
Views
20K
Replies
153
Views
18K
Back
Top