Para / Ortho Hydrogen (H2) Spins

  • Thread starter Thread starter YAHA
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hydrogen
YAHA
Messages
121
Reaction score
0
Is there an intuitive way of understanding these terms? I understand the mathematics that shows why there are 3 states with proton spins aligned(orthohydrogen) and 1 with spins misaligned.

However, when you count them, there are really only 2 states in which the spins are aligned (up-up and down-down). The third one arises from purely mathematical considerations.

The same goes for the state when the spins are misaligned (up-down, down-up).

What is a better way of thinking about this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
YAHA said:
Is there an intuitive way of understanding these terms? I understand the mathematics that shows why there are 3 states with proton spins aligned(orthohydrogen) and 1 with spins misaligned.

However, when you count them, there are really only 2 states in which the spins are aligned (up-up and down-down). The third one arises from purely mathematical considerations.

The same goes for the state when the spins are misaligned (up-down, down-up).

What is a better way of thinking about this?

This picture provides an intuitive way of visually representing the different types of spin. Think of the para form as having the spin of the two protons "locked" together. The ortho form allows the two protons to be "locked" together 3 different ways, both up, one up/one down, both down.

h_forms_small.jpg
 
Maybe it helps to remind yourself that a state like ## 1/\sqrt{2}(|\uparrow\rangle \pm |\downarrow \rangle)## for a single spin is an eigenstate with the spin pointing in plus or minus the x direction. You can show that the two particle state with m=0 actually is a superposition of both spins pointing in the same direction in the x or y directions.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top