Parachutes for small planes -- so many lives saved....

  • Thread starter Thread starter berkeman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planes
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the effectiveness of parachute technology in small planes, noting that it has documented saves over the years. While most small plane accidents are stall/spin related, which parachutes may not help, they can be beneficial in cases of structural failure. Some participants argue that parachutes can deploy at low altitudes, potentially saving lives even in challenging situations. However, skepticism remains regarding their effectiveness during low-level spins, with claims needing substantial evidence. Overall, the conversation underscores the potential life-saving benefits of parachutes in aviation.
Engineering news on Phys.org
Most accidents in small planes are of the stall/spin type, and -in those cases- a parachute is of little use. If the engine stops because of a mechanical failure (or lack of fuel, something not at all unusual...) you can always glide the plane and land it, if more or less roughly... A parachute is useful in the case of an structural failure, if you lose a wing, for example. It's rare, but does sometimes happen...
 
NTW said:
Most accidents in small planes are of the stall/spin type, and -in those cases- a parachute is of little use. If the engine stops because of a mechanical failure (or lack of fuel, something not at all unusual...) you can always glide the plane and land it, if more or less roughly... A parachute is useful in the case of an structural failure, if you lose a wing, for example. It's rare, but does sometimes happen...

Actually, according to cirrus their chutes work in both spins and stalls, here's a cool video:
 
Here's an unfortunate video of a midair collision with chute deployment. The occupants jumped from the burning plane to their deaths. and were doomed regardless it seemed. What's interesting is that chute still functioned with a destroyed and burning air frame:

 
Fatal accidents related to stall/spin use to happen at low altitude. If you have enough altitude for the deployment of a parachute, that altitude is also sufficient for a standard recovery maneuver. No need for a parachute...
 
NTW said:
Fatal accidents related to stall/spin use to happen at low altitude. If you have enough altitude for the deployment of a parachute, that altitude is also sufficient for a standard recovery maneuver. No need for a parachute...

Except recovering from spins is nearly impossible in aircraft not designed to do them in the first place.
 
That's not correct. On the contrary, almost all planes, specially light ones, can easily exit from a spin. It is a procedure covered in the pilot operating handbook. It usually consists in easing the stick forward and pushing right pedal for left spin or vice-versa.
 
  • #10
NTW said:
Fatal accidents related to stall/spin use to happen at low altitude. If you have enough altitude for the deployment of a parachute, that altitude is also sufficient for a standard recovery maneuver. No need for a parachute...

That isn't necessarily true, depending on the parachute design. Parachutes can be designed for deployment in a few hundred feet or less, while spin/stall recovery can take several thousand.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #11
cjl said:
That isn't necessarily true, depending on the parachute design. Parachutes can be designed for deployment in a few hundred feet or less, while spin/stall recovery can take several thousand.

If you know of a single case of a plane saved by the parachute after a low-level stall/spin, you should mention it... Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence...
 
  • #12
Claiming that parachute deployment can be done in a few hundred feet is hardly an extraordinary claim.

If you need a source though, according to BRS Aviation, who makes parachutes for this kind of thing:

Q. How low can the parachute work?
A. The altitude required is a function of speed more than height. FAA certified tests have shown that full parachute inflation could occur as low as 260-290 feet above the ground.
I don't know about you, but I certainly wouldn't want to try a spin recovery from <500 feet AGL.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and berkeman
  • #13
cjl said:
according to BRS Aviation
Did you mean BRS Aerospace ? .. :ok:?
 
  • #14
Eh, sure. Their webpage had the header "BRS Aviation", but that must be a subset of their overall company.

(it was taken from here: http://www.brsaerospace.com/faq.aspx )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #15
cjl said:
Their webpage had the header "BRS Aviation"
Right you are... :thumbup:

In fact, there are two Home pages...
http://www.brsaerospace.com/brs_aviation_home.aspx
http://www.brsaerospace.com/default.aspx

But, they seem to call themselves... ?[/PLAIN]
Ballistic Recovery Systems, Inc.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #16
cjl said:
Claiming that parachute deployment can be done in a few hundred feet is hardly an extraordinary claim.

If you need a source though, according to BRS Aviation, who makes parachutes for this kind of thing:

I don't know about you, but I certainly wouldn't want to try a spin recovery from <500 feet AGL.
Well, you haven't provided a single case of a plane saved by the parachute after a low-level stall/spin. No wonder you didn't... Once you enter a spin below -say- 500 ft, you are doomed, parachute or no parachute. Not even the manufacturers of those systems dare to make that claim, because they know that it's impossible. Thus, they mention other causes, but never the low-level stall/spin, a well-known killer...
 
  • #17
I don't need to provide a specific case - if you enter a spin at 400ft, but the chute can deploy in <300, you could still in theory save the plane (well, the people in it at least - the airframe is often pretty heavily damaged). What's your basis for claiming this is impossible, besides your own personal incredulity (which really doesn't mean anything at all as far as evidence is concerned).
 
  • #18
Whelp, it's my thread, and I'll close it on that positive note. I still think it's a great technology. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
Back
Top