Parallel plate capactiors otherside plate

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the opposite side of a charged parallel plate capacitor has an equal and opposite charge. It suggests using ammeters to measure current flow on both sides of the capacitor, which would indicate charge presence. Kirchhoff's current law is referenced as a method to support the conservation of electric charge. The relationship between current, charge, and time (q=it) is highlighted to provide further insight. Overall, the conversation emphasizes experimental methods and fundamental laws of physics to demonstrate charge distribution in capacitors.
pankazmaurya
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
how can it be proved that the otherside of the charged parallel plate capacitor has some charge on it
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends what you mean by "prove"...

In fact the charges are equal and opposite...how about putting an ammeter on each side of the capacitor..one between the capacitor and the positive and the other between the capacitor and negative side of whatever supply you use...

You can also use Kirchoffs current law...if you accept conservation of electric charge.

If you remember that current is charge flow per unit time it may give you insight...q=it,
i = q/t.
 
Naty1 said:
Depends what you mean by "prove"...

In fact the charges are equal and opposite...how about putting an ammeter on each side of the capacitor..one between the capacitor and the positive and the other between the capacitor and negative side of whatever supply you use...

You can also use Kirchoffs current law...if you accept conservation of electric charge.

If you remember that current is charge flow per unit time it may give you insight...q=it,
i = q/t.

on the other side
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    2.6 KB · Views: 436
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top