How is the equation for impedance in a parallel resonance LC circuit derived?

AI Thread Summary
At resonance frequency in a parallel resonance LC circuit, the impedance reaches its maximum value and is purely resistive. The impedance is expressed as L/Cr, but the derivation of this equation is not clearly explained in available resources. Users are seeking a step-by-step breakdown of how this relationship is established. Existing references do not provide adequate clarification on the derivation process. Understanding this derivation is essential for grasping the behavior of parallel resonance circuits.
uzair_ha91
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
"At resonance frequency, the circuit impedance is maximum. It is resistive and its value is given L/Cr..."
The book doesn't explain how impedance equals L/Cr, so I'm confused here. How is it derived? (Can you please show all the steps?)
Thanking in advance...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
uzair_ha91 said:
"At resonance frequency, the circuit impedance is maximum. It is resistive and its value is given L/Cr..."
The book doesn't explain how impedance equals L/Cr, so I'm confused here. How is it derived? (Can you please show all the steps?)
Thanking in advance...

This resource should help you out:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RLC_circuit

.
 
Sorry , the article does not have that equation nor any explanation regarding that...
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top