Parallel Transport: Constancy of Magnitudes & Angles Along Geodesic

AI Thread Summary
Parallel transport in a Riemannian manifold involves the preservation of vector magnitudes and angles along an affinely parameterized geodesic. The tangent vector X defines the direction of the geodesic, while the vector field Y is said to be parallely propagated if the covariant derivative satisfies \nabla_X T = 0. The angle between two vectors is calculated using the formula θ = cos⁻¹(g(X,Y) / (|X||Y|)), where |X| is the norm derived from the metric tensor. The discussion emphasizes that both the magnitudes of vectors X and Y, as well as the angle between them, remain constant during parallel transport along the geodesic. Understanding these concepts is crucial for studying the geometric properties of Riemannian manifolds.
latentcorpse
Messages
1,411
Reaction score
0
A vector field Y is parallely propagated (with respect to the Levi-Civita connection)
along an affinely parameterized geodesic with tangent vector X in a Riemannian
manifold. Show that the magnitudes of the vectors X, Y and the angle between
them are constant along the geodesic.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Some questions to get you started.

What is the definition of parallel transport?
What does along the geodesic mean?
How is the angle between two vectors defined?
 
betel said:
Some questions to get you started.

What is the definition of parallel transport?
What does along the geodesic mean?
How is the angle between two vectors defined?

The tensor T is parrallely transported along the curve with tangent X^a if \nabla_X T=0

Along the geodesic means along the affinely parameterised curve of shortest distance (think i may be a bit off here but hopefully you can clear it up!)

On a Riemannian manifold, the angle between two vectors is given by

\theta = \cos^{-1} \left( \frac{ g(X,Y) }{ ( |X||Y| ) } \right) where |X|= \sqrt{ g(X,X)}
 
So what is your problem?
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top