Are Parallel Universes the Key to Understanding the Multiverse Theory?

AI Thread Summary
The multiverse theory posits that multiple parallel universes exist alongside our own, each governed by different laws of nature. These parallel universes may coexist in the same space but do not interact due to their relative speeds exceeding light. Some theories suggest that these universes could vary significantly, either in minor details or fundamental laws. Notably, a hypothesis presented by Michio Kaku proposes that parallel universes might explain the phenomenon of dark matter. Overall, the concept of parallel universes remains a fascinating and complex area of study in cosmology.
shyam1993
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

The multiverse is a theory in which our universe is not the only one, but states that many universes exist parallel to each other. These distinct universes within the multiverse theory are called parallel universes. A variety of different theories lend themselves to a multiverse viewpoint.

As far as i have heard and read, the existence of parallel universes is not a surprise and that the fundamental laws of the "nature" that is the nature of "our Universe " do not apply over there. Some believe that the parallel universe is co-existent with ours- that is the particles of both the universes are in the same space but cannot interact with each other since they all move at relative speeds greater than that of the speed of the light. In such a universe the effect precedes the cause, unlike our universe, it is a direct consequence of the special theory of relativity.
refer to http://www.manyuniverses.com for more details.
 
Space news on Phys.org
Yes, and in all of those universes there are creatures which are trying to advertise and sell their crackpot books.
 
There are many multiverse theories. It's predicted that the parallel universes are exactly like ours but differ in very tiny variables or gigantic factors like the laws of nature. Some of these universes are said to be in a higher dimension.
 
Saw an interesting talk by Michio Kaku yesterday on the internet in which he said that one of the far-out hypotheses now is that maybe parallel universes are the source of the gravity that we see as dark matter. I have not the knowledge to even judge whether this is just silly or not, but based on what I have read of cosmology, it can get pretty hard to tell whether or not something is silly and it is at least interesting.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top